Jump to content

Recommended Posts

But...the sentence is about Wikileaks, and I'm not sure that Wikileaks is a Domestic Business.

 

I was referrin' to the State Department giving directives to PayPal, which is a domestic business.

 

The issue has nothin' to do with who the end beneficiary is, eh? Do yeh want the State Department trying to intimidate a U.S. corporation into not doing business with [insert name here] whom they happen to disagree with? If the State Department doesn't Catholic Charities because it interferes with the U.S. efforts to encourage population control in Africa, can it tell PayPal and MasterCard not to allow U.S. citizens to make donations to Catholic Charities International?

 

Da issue has nothin' to do with Wikileaks, it has to do with constitutionally questionable behavior by da Obama administration. What they're doin' to Wikileaks now they can do to someone else tomorrow.

 

I, too, found da unjustified expansion of the OFAC list durin' the Bush administration to be highly problematic.

 

Beavah

(This message has been edited by Beavah)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...