Jump to content

RobK

Members
  • Content Count

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RobK

  1. Merlyn_LeRoy writes (quoting me): >How does a military base chartering a Boy Scout troop require anyone to follow a religion? It isn't; but your previous paragraph didn't outline everything that the first amendment forbids. For example, if the military tried to create a youth group that excluded Jews, that wouldn't violate anything in your opening paragraph, either. But it wouldn't be lawful. The other things the First Amendment protects aren't relevant to this discussion (eg free assembly, redress of grievances). I have completely covered the religion aspect of the Firs
  2. I'd just like to make a point about the First Amendment. It says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Congress is forbidden from creating a state religion that all citizens must join, and Congress is forbidden from preventing you from following your religion. Congress cannot require you to follow a religion, nor can Congress require you not to follow a religion. How does a military base chartering a Boy Scout troop require anyone to follow a religion? How does a military base chartering a Boy Scout troop prevent an
  3. I've carried one pocket knife or another every day since I was a cub scout. I carried them to school through college, and I carry one to work. I've also regularly carried a Gerber multi-tool for several years now. My current pocket knife is a Gerber EZ-Out with a clip so I don't even need a pocket. I even carry it when swimming, clipped in the waistband of my shorts. Being without my knife would be like being without my left hand.
  4. What's wrong with a group of men and boys having time together without women around? I doubt there are many men who want to actively deny women or girls the right to do things in a group without men around. And I really don't believe that the idea is to actively deny women any opportunities to camp. The presence of even one woman changes the group dynamic. It's a subtle change and women won't generally be aware of it since they can't know what it's like to be in a group of men without women. In fact men often aren't aware of the change. But that change is there. I believe it is good
  5. "Pedophilia has little if anything to do with being a fruit or not." Unfortuneately, this is simply not true. Most convicted pedophiles self-identify as homosexual, and in fact, most homosexuals were sexually molested as a child or had their first sexual encounter (a homosexual one) with an adult during their teens. Psychology in this area is so heavily politicized that you won't get a straight answer (pardon the pun) from almost any psychologist about it. If the data in a study showed that every single homosexual studied was a self-avowed axe-murderer, you'd be told, at best, that the da
  6. KoreaScouter, I think it is largely an American thing. America is mostly made up of other countries' misfits, the people who wanted adventure or couldn't stand to be told what to do. That's why we have so many more of these problems than other countries. America was the place to which those that didn't fit escaped. If America hadn't been available, these problems would've cropped up earlier and more evenly distributed among other nations. -RobK
  7. I've heard of doing this with potatos and I bet it would work quite nicely with eggs. You thickly coat the outside with mud, then place it in your fire. When the mud is thoroughly dry, it's ready to eat. -RobK
  8. Yaworski, Pull your kid out of that school, get him off those drugs, and homeschool him! Homeschooling is not that hard and it's definitely worth it. It's not even really expensive. What your paying for the drugs will probably cover all your expenses. There are gobs of resources on the net to get you started. The school your kid is in obviously only cares about having compliant sheep and they intend to drug your kid into compliance. Get him out before they hurt him anymore! -RobK
  9. I think both Bob White and Yaworski have valid points. Bob makes the point that times change and we have to keep up with current technology. Yaworski makes the contrasting point that, just because times and technology change, doesn't necessarily make older skills useless, especially for fulfilling the aims of scouting. Let's look at ax and saw work. I just had a tree fall in my back yard and I needed to cut some of the limbs. I used my ax and pack saw and skills I learned in scouts. I didn't have to pay money to someone to do it for me. I was self-reliant. Ax and saw skills are still usef
  10. It sounds like what is needed is not so much co-ed scouting, but for GSUSA to get its act together and provide a real scouting program for girls. What are the Girl Guides like in other countrys? Do they suffer from the problems that GSUSA does? -Rob
  11. "The other case I personally know of is my son's friend. He is 11, lives with single mom and 2 older sisters." This is certainly a boy who is trying to learn to be a man and is having tremendous difficulties. And how could he not, living in a home with a mother who is angry at men, and two sisters. I think he would defintely benefit from scouting through the exposure to positive male role models. Theodore Roosevelt wrote a good article in 1900 on the American boy. It's available at http://www.bartleby.com/58/10.html.
  12. RobK

    Your Uniform

    I'm not aware of shorts being part of the British military uniform at that period of time. Admittedly, B-P did put it together with availability of surplus clothes in mind. As I recall he used the uniform he put together for the SAC as a model. But he did design it intentionally to be suited for outdoor wear. "The field uniform looks formal because it is meant for formal occasions." The only problem with that is it doesn't look formal. It doesn't look like something I'd wear to a formal occasion. It looks like "buisness casual" office wear.
  13. RobK

    Your Uniform

    While Bob White makes a good point, that older is not always better, I must make the contrasting point that newer isn't necessarily better either. I still much prefer older uniforms. My ideal uniform would go back to essentially what B-P first instituted, a long sleeve shirt, shorts, knee socks with flashes, and a campaign hat. That sort of uniform makes the wearer look like he's ready for the out-doors. The current uniform makes the wearer look like he's ready for the office. B-P was intimately familiar with the out-doors and understood what sort of clothing was really useful.
×
×
  • Create New...