1963Eagle

When I started this I was concerned that I'd be "recognized" and "outed" for opposing the SE. (Like that would be a surprise to HIM!) Allow me to give some specifics. We have had NO District Chairman for 16 months (the previous chairman was weak) effectively we have NO District Committee. A good meeting would be 5 in attendance (2 SMs, 1 CM are regulars). In that same time period we have had THREE DEs. The latest one having never been a Scout/Scouter and still trying to figure out who has what roles. The folks that want to restore the District are: 1. A retired military person, who is

Can anyone tell me the precedent for the ruling by our SE that "NO SM or CM can serve on the District Committee in a Chairman role"? Seems to me that the District Committee should decide who serves in what positions, not the SE. AM I off base here? Is there a rule I don't know of (I am sure there are lots of them, but this is the one I am concerned of today) Are there other Councils that have similar SE rulings? YIS