Jump to content

Change to GSS - Registration Required for Overnight


Recommended Posts

So the awaited change to the GSS has happened. With some few exceptions, I think, adults camping overnight outside of Cub Scouts must be registered adults in fee-paid positions or program participants. MBCs are specifically excluded.

https://www.scouting.org/health-and-safety/gss/gss01/?fbclid=IwAR3Va17cZl5U4Aj-HqKFXP4Havk9mtp530Mrw6GJ7ZFdBlRQX9I25GsfXNA

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Maybe cover half the adult fee rather than the full thing? It is an acknowledgement that their help is appreciated, but the economic reality is also changing. 

It's not that they are not approved... It's that those positions are not part of the "adult fee required position(s)"   That is, you must be registered in some other position before you can be a Chapt

The TCC was clear that they did not approve of the 72 hour rule.  BSA was never going to exit bankruptcy without this change.  It was one of the changes that switched TCC from rejecting to supporting

1 hour ago, KublaiKen said:

Both Chapter and Lodge Adviser seem to be missing from the list of adult positions approved for overnight camping. Are they just considered committee members, or are they prohibited from attending overnight OA events? 🤔

We currently have only one (Chapter) Adviser that is not associated to a unit. They are registered as a District Member-at-large.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, KublaiKen said:

Both Chapter and Lodge Adviser seem to be missing from the list of adult positions approved for overnight camping. Are they just considered committee members, or are they prohibited from attending overnight OA events? 🤔

 

The GSS wording states "All adults staying overnight in connection with a Scouting activity must be currently registered in an adult fee required position as listed or as an adult program participant".  I'd expect both Chapter & Lodge Adviser would be covered as "an adult program participant."

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, AltadenaCraig said:

 

The GSS wording states "All adults staying overnight in connection with a Scouting activity must be currently registered in an adult fee required position as listed or as an adult program participant".  I'd expect both Chapter & Lodge Adviser would be covered as "an adult program participant."

No, adult program participants are clearly defined as members who are 18 but not yet 21 and are registered in programs like Sea Scouts, Venturing, and Exploring. So those two positions are not adult program participants, nor are they "an adult fee required position as listed," since they aren't on the list. Obviously they can hold additional registered positions, like at the unit level as mentioned above, but that shouldn't be a requirement, should it? I think those positions should be listed, for clarity if nothing else.

Edited by KublaiKen
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KublaiKen said:

No, adult program participants are clearly defined as members who are 18 but not yet 21 and are registered in programs like Sea Scouts, Venturing, and Exploring. So those two positions are not adult program participants, nor are they "an adult fee required position as listed," since they aren't on the list. Obviously they can hold additional registered positions, like at the unit level as mentioned above, but that shouldn't be a requirement, should it? I think those positions should be listed, for clarity if nothing else.

Lodges are Council programs, not units. There are no BSA position codes for Lodge Adviser/Lodge Associate Adviser etc. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KublaiKen said:

No, adult program participants are clearly defined as members who are 18 but not yet 21 and are registered in programs like Sea Scouts, Venturing, and Exploring. So those two positions are not adult program participants, nor are they "an adult fee required position as listed," since they aren't on the list. Obviously they can hold additional registered positions, like at the unit level as mentioned above, but that shouldn't be a requirement, should it? I think those positions should be listed, for clarity if nothing else.

 

13 hours ago, KublaiKen said:

Both Chapter and Lodge Adviser seem to be missing from the list of adult positions approved for overnight camping. Are they just considered committee members, or are they prohibited from attending overnight OA events? 🤔

It's not that they are not approved... It's that those positions are not part of the "adult fee required position(s)"   That is, you must be registered in some other position before you can be a Chapter or Lodge Adviser, insofar as I understand this...

As @HashTagScouts alludes, they must first be in a District (or unit or council) fee paid position, before they can wear the additional hat of Adviser.

Edited by InquisitiveScouter
  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Our troop, following in the footsteps of my youth troop, have a family campout each year. This is useful in many ways. It allows parents in new families to spend quality time with the troop adults. It also is a great answer for people who want to bring a sibling on other campouts - “sorry, but they can come on the annual family campout”. I guess we can’t do that any longer?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mrjohns2 said:

Our troop, following in the footsteps of my youth troop, have a family campout each year. This is useful in many ways. It allows parents in new families to spend quality time with the troop adults. It also is a great answer for people who want to bring a sibling on other campouts - “sorry, but they can come on the annual family campout”. I guess we can’t do that any longer?

That would be my understanding of the rule.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I also wonder how this works in conjunction with the requirement that all aspects of the program be open to observation by parents or leaders.  If Mr. Dad demands to attend a campout to observe, does that FORCE us to take Mr. Dad onto our committee (whether we want to or not) just to permit him that right?  Or do we just say "If you insist, then your Scout cannot attend because you are unable to attend without being regsitered"

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No.  Mr. Dad just has to sever the "connection" for the overnight...

You could take that ad absurdum.

All adults staying overnight in connection with a Scouting activity must be currently registered in an adult fee required position as listed or as an adult program participant.

So, at bed time, he just says "Goodnight folks! I'm going to sleep on my own in a campsite I rented for myself.  See you at breakfast!"

 

  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, InquisitiveScouter said:

So, at bed time, he just says "Goodnight folks! I'm going to sleep on my own in a campsite I rented for myself.  See you at breakfast!"

...because the kinds of parents that insist on observing are just this reasonable and level headed :) Unfortunately I don't view this situation as ad absurdum.  It's an eventuality.  I guess I'll cross that bridge as it comes, but Scouts BSA certainly do seem to spend plenty of time devising new and interesting ways to complicate our unit structures and YPT compliance.  This fee-required addition is one I can't get behind at all.  Accomplishes nothing net-new in terms of YPT, the only net difference I see is money in Scouts BSA's pocket.  Only hurts the units and the Scouts in my book.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, curious_scouter said:

the only net difference I see is money in Scouts BSA's pocket.

You hit the nail right on the head, partner 😜

Gotta pay those salaries.  In 2019, Surbaugh made $1.1M  (2019 is last public form I could find)

https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/221576300_201912_990_2021030217778557.pdf

$134M in assets sales in 2019 also...

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/221576300

compare that to the 2018 numbers...

Edited by InquisitiveScouter
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, curious_scouter said:

This fee-required addition is one I can't get behind at all.  Accomplishes nothing net-new in terms of YPT, the only net difference I see is money in Scouts BSA's pocket.  Only hurts the units and the Scouts in my book.

Not entirely true. It ensures every adult that is camping overnight in a Scouting program is background checked. I'm curious if that came out of documented incidents, if that's one of the changes the bankruptcy process made happen, or it's a creative way to get more in fees, as you said. The BSA is rarely transparent about such things, so if there is actual data supporting the rule change, we'll never see it. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...