Jump to content

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Eagledad said:

I have a question: when I was a scout, we were taught to turn the drowned person on their chest and compress the back a couple times to force some of the water out of the lungs. Now we are told to got strait to two breaths then CPR. What about the water in the lungs?

Barry

The one time I had to resuscitate anyone it was a little girl (about 9-10) who had been submerged for less than a minute or so.  She was unconscious and not breathing, but had a pulse.  When I gave her the two rescue breaths, it stimulated a convulsion/spasm in the lungs that expelled a large portion of the water and allowed her to start breathing again.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Eagle94-A1 said:

Actually they want you to start with compressions, then breaths now. The idea is that some oxygen is still in the bloodstream, and by pumping, you can get it going where needed.

OK, that makes sense, but the water is still in the lungs. Wouldn't emptying the lungs first raise the probability of success?

I'm sure there is good reasoning, I'm just curious.

Barry

Edit: Just read elitts's post and that seems to answer my question. Thanks all.

Edited by Eagledad
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...