eisely 13 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTc5ZWE2ZWIzMWZiM2NiZTc2NzNkM2E4MjY2ODkxNDQ= The link above will take you to an article in the National Review online about Eric Holder. The article mostly focuses on Holder's role in the Marc Rich pardon, but also mentions in passing the clemency for the Puerto Rican terrorists whom Clinton pardoned to gain political advantage for Hillary in her initial senate campaign. Just trying to keep the pot boiling.(This message has been edited by eisely) Link to post Share on other sites
NJCubScouter 1389 Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Just trying to keep the pot boiling. For what purpose? Don't we have enough pots boiling already? Link to post Share on other sites
frankj 10 Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 How about for this purpose: Holder gave bad advice when he was in Clinton's administration and now he is being recycled into Obama's administration into the the AG slot, where just may give more bad advice. This is not the type of "change" that some people were expecting. Is there a new rule that no one can say anything critical of what they perceive to be a bad cabinet pick? Link to post Share on other sites
frankj 10 Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Concerning Eric Holder's role in the pardon of FALN terrorists. http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWFlZGE4OGUwNjU4NWYxNDMwYTBlN2EyMjQyNzExODY= "Change you can believe in ..." Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now