Chapter 11 Announced - Part 6 - Plan 5.0/TCC Plan TBD in Issues & Politics Posted yesterday at 04:15 AM 12 minutes ago, PeterHopkins said: For the moment, let's assume that advising clients in closed state to vote yes is sound legal advice. How could he make that video and give the same advice to every client? If it's true that survivors in closed states cannot do better than what the plan offers, it must also be true that survivors in open states are virtually assured of doing better by suing the local councils in state courts. They wouldn't be sharing anything with those in closed states. I don't know how he could only say that those in closed states risk (and, the way he put it, should expect) getting nothing without also saying that those in open states are making a large financial sacrifice, if the plan is approved. It seems to me that if an attorney is representing survivors in both open and closed states, a conflict of interest exists IF we assume that advising clients in closed states is sound legal advice. Remember....open, closed...attorneys will get their percentage. It doesn't matter who gets what as long as it gets out the door so a percentage of the total awarded comes raining down.