InquisitiveScouter

17 minutes ago, WisconsinMomma said:

I think since we have two troops in the same community, it makes great sense to merge rather than have two distinct troops.  I wonder if we should plan in advance for next school year to be the last year of our Troop and then dissolve/merge with the neighbor troop.  This would give all the current Life Scouts another year to finish Eagle with this troop should they want it.

 

The issue though is the trailer and all the money.  I am sure we can find people to take them, it's just -- what is the right way to to do this?  The chartered org technically would get it all.  Can troops disburse their treasury otherwise, like donate to Council, or the other troop in the area? 

 

My husband talked about placeholder registrations to hold the Troop for the large Wolf pack coming up but it is unclear how may youth would stay into scouting and you need adult leaders most of all.  I think he is nervous about the "old guard" from 3+ years ago showing up and making a stink, but they've left.  In my view, it's time to move on. 

 

Thank you and your husband for doing the work it takes to keep a Troop going!!

This sounds like a normal "down" in the life cycle of a Troop.  But it does beg a question: "What do you think is the "right" size for a Troop?"

In Aids to Scoutmastership, (recommended reading) BP thought the answer was 16.  But, he granted that most were twice the man he was, so he said he could see 32. 

     "The number in a Troop should preferably not exceed thirty-two. I suggest this number because in training boys myself I have found that sixteen was about as many as I could deal with-in getting at and bringing out the individual character in each. I allow for other people being twice as capable as myself and hence the total of thirty-two.

     Men talk of having fine Troops of 60 or even 100-and their leaders tell me that their boys are equally well trained as in smaller Troops. I express admiration (“admiration” literally translated means “surprise”), and I don’t believe them.

     “Why worry about individual training?” they ask. Because it is the only way by which you can educate. You can instruct any number of boys, a thousand at a time if you have a loud voice and attractive methods of disciplinary means. But that is not training-it is not education.

     Education is the thing that counts in building character and In making men.

     The incentive to perfect himself, when properly instilled into the individual, brings about his active effort on the line most suitable to his temperament and powers.

     It is not the slightest use to preach the Scout Law or to give it out as orders to a crowd of boys: each mind requires its special exposition of them and the ambition to carry them out."   page 30

http://www.thedump.scoutscan.com/a2sm.pdf

Our Troop is 55, and it is DIFFICULT! to minister adequately to the needs of that many Scouts.  Basically, we have 6 Patrols that fairly well function on their own as "mini-Troops", each with an assigned Assistant Scoutmaster, who, frankly, functions as a Scoutmaster.  (When they don't do well mentoring as ASM, that patrol suffers!)  This is the only way it works, and it is, I believe, what BP was aiming at with his idea.

So, IMO, I think you can do just fine with four Scouts.  After you get below that point, you do not really have a Patrol. (See optimal working group size.)  However, I think your council may have restrictions on how many you need to re-charter (Five, I think??  Ask your registrar!)

https://howtosavetheworld.ca/2009/03/18/the-optimal-size-of-groups/

(BTW, group dynamics are key.  Any successful large group you have ever been a part of has been divided up into small groups like this.  Basic size of first echelon military unit?  Four 😜 https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/Experience/Military-Units/army/#army  There is a reason for this...)

Instead of a plan to draw down, How about first a plan to grow/replace?  Then have an alternate plan to disband.  If all you do is plan to disband, it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

-------------------------------------------

As for your hubby... sit down with him over coffee.  Tell him you want to help him be successful with the Troop.  Ask him to spend a little time to come up with his top three things (priorities) the Troop needs help with.  Then, either do them (if you can), OR, work with your committee to find someone to do them!!  

Both of you will appreciate this approach.

-------------------------------------------

OK, who cares about the stuff and money?  It is just stuff and money.  To help prepare for draw down (or growth), first, make sure the trailer title and registration is in the CO's name (if your state requires a title and plate for a trailer.) 

Next, start spending the money.  With a plan.  Send your Scouts to NYLT.  Pay their full tuition to Summer Camp next year.  Send them to a High Adventure Base! (HAB)  Plan your own week-long Summer Scouting Adventure instead of going to an over-priced boutique HAB.  etc, etc, etc  Just make sure you use the money for Scouting purposes, and that it is equitable among your Scouts.

(Use this as a recruiting tool!  "First five Scouts to join our Troop get to go to camp at half price!")

You are correct... technically, it all belongs to the CO.  So, if the Troop is to disband, then they get to have a say in the disposition of equipment and money.  There are two basic alternatives for the CO for equipment:

1.  Keep it!  We still want to sponsor a Troop in the future, so we want to keep the gear for that eventuality.

2.  Get rid of it!  Offer it to other Troops and Packs, or sell it.

Now, for the money:  (You may use it liberally for the Scouts in your CO's unit, but tread CAREFULLY with sending money outside your CO's umbrella.  They have ultimate say in that!)

1.  Keep it!  We still want to sponsor a Troop in the future, so we want to keep the money for that eventuality.

2.  Get rid of it:

     Option A: If your Scouts transfer to a unit that keep Scout accounts, transfer a portion with them.  This could have tax implications, so be careful.  NEVER, EVER give the money to individuals.  The IRS would be very interested if you did this 😜 

     Option B: Get your CO's permission to transfer the money to another CO.  Again, this has tax implications, so be careful.  Talk with the Treasurers of both CO's A LOT before you do this.

     Option C 😄 (aka, the "nuclear" option):  Give it to council.  It disappears down the rat hole 😜   

There are other options...

NOTE:  That is a lot of money.  IMO, you ought to have no more than one year's Troop expenses on hand.  Recharter fees, awards and advancements, training, etc, etc, etc.  (Do you have a budget??  Do you know how much money you spent last year?)

3 minutes ago, Eagle94-A1 said:

@Cburkhardt,

You may not realize it, but there are ways for SEs, and to a lesser extent DEs, to manipulate who is, and is not, on a district committee, council executive committee, or council executive board. When I was a DE, my SE and DFS had an in-council training session on how to get the folks we want onto those committees. They essentially said we should get folks who will shut up and do what we tell them to do without question.

One of the reasons why I was in trouble with them is because I refused to replace some "critics" with "yes men." I wanted the best folks for the job to be on my district committee, and didn't mind having folks coming up with alternatives, especially since these alternatives 95% of the time had better results than what I was being told to do. They couldn't fire me because I was meeting my goals, and they had no excuse todo so. But they could make my life miserable, which is what they did.

The way Pros control who is on the committees and boards is via the nominations committee. They get folks who are yes men on those committees to select other yes men for the various positions.

"...The one part which I can claim as mine towards promoting the Movement is that I have been lucky enough to find you men and women to form a group of the right stamp who can be relied upon to carry it on to its goal. You will do well to keep your eyes open, in your turn, for worthy successors to who you can, with confidence, hand on the torch. Don't let it become a salaried organization: keep it a voluntary movement of patriotic service." - BP

30 minutes ago, Tron said:

Training is key; however, it doesn't matter how well trained a volunteer is if they don't want to run the actual program AND it's all about "their kids" and not providing a good program. All of the dying troops in my area have the same things in common: no relationship to a pack, cadre of key 3 leaders who need to rotate out, doing their own thing.  All of the dying packs in my area have the same things in common: only have a relationship with 1 troop, do not run year round programs, doing their own thing. 

 

@Tron, I have noticed this over many years of Scouting as well...

There is no attempt to "standardize" the program, or encourage/incentivize Troops to hold to those "standards."  So, you wind up with everyone doing their "version" of Scouting.  Most never pick up the book and read to try to find the purpose of what we are doing.  In most parent minds, the purpose is to make my kid an Eagle Scout so he/she can put in on a college/service academy application.

You most likely know this, but this "standardization" is the purpose of the Commissioner Corps, starting with Unit Commissioners.

https://www.scouting.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/NCST-Unit-Commissioner-Job-Description.pdf

The last time we saw a Commissioner in our unit was when we invited them to present an award on behalf of the council.

During my 7+ years tenure as Scoutmaster, we had one unit contact (at our request) and never once saw a unit assessment. 

That said, I understand the program and policies, and during that time, our unit charter was always clean and on time, and we always reached Gold Level on Journey to Excellence (for which we submitted the report at recharter time).  (BTW, during the last year, we finally hit one of my personal goals for our unit: to reach a maximum score on the JTE.)  So, perhaps, since we were not a "problem unit", their attention was devoted elsewhere.  But, a phone call to our COR, CC, or SM saying, "Hey, just wanted to let you guys know you are doing a great job!" would have been a 2-minute phone call or email well spent.

---------------------------------------

Another mindset I have seen is from many adults being so defensive about their unit program.  They think they are right, and even if they aren't, well, it IS their program and they'll darn well run it they way they want to.

There is no mindset of "continuous process improvement" or asking simple questions like "What is the right way to do this?" or "What is a better way to do this?"

It's just, "I don't care about all that stuff.  Let's muddle through, get my kid's Eagle, and get the heck out..."

What can men do against such reckless hate? 😛

https://youtu.be/t6qQSll7InQ

Official policy from Guide to Awards and Insignia: (G2AI)

"While wearing the uniform is not mandatory, it is highly encouraged. The leaders of Scouting— both volunteer and professional—promote the wearing of the correct complete uniform on all suitable occasions."

https://filestore.scouting.org/filestore/pdf/33066/33066_Official_Policy_WEB.pdf

(Entire document available at https://www.scouting.org/resources/insignia-guide/ )

Now, what is a "complete uniform"?  There are three variations "authorized" in the literature.

1.  "Field Uniform"  See the description of this in your BSA Handbook,  (page 21, as I am using the 13th Edition, 2016 printing.  YMMV.  = Shirt, Pants/Shorts, Belt, Socks, Shoes/Boots, Cap (optional per PLC), Neckerchief (optional per PLC))

2.  "Activity Uniform"  same page = "When you're headed outdoors to do something active...T-shirt with Scout pants or shorts, or wear other clothing that is appropriate for the events of the day. [emphasis added]

NOTE:  you'll notice this does not say anything specific about the "T-shirt", nor about Scout socks/belt/cap/etc for Activity Uniform.  IMO, this gives the PLC carte blanche to decide what uniform is appropriate for their outdoor activities.  [BTW, "uniform" means all alike 😜 ]

3.  Neckerchief only - "When engaged in Scouting activities, members may wear the neckerchief with appropriate nonuniform clothing to identify them as Scouts."  ("nonuniform" means they don't all have to be alike 😛 )

From the G2AI, page 13 https://filestore.scouting.org/filestore/pdf/33066/33066_Special_Regulations.pdf

[But, also earlier on page 13, a Troop (the PLC) may decide not to use neckerchiefs: "Scout neckerchiefs are optional. Troops choose their own official neckerchief. All members of a troop wear the same color. The troop decides by vote, and all members abide by the decision."]

The PLC decides what uniform is to be worn at meetings and events, and as "officers" of the Troop, part of their job (and every other Position of Responsibility) is to "Wear the Scout Uniform Correctly"

https://filestore.scouting.org/filestore/training/pdf/510-046_PocketCards17.pdf

Now, with all that info, what does your PLC decide to do???

Enjoy!

P.S.  If you want to wear the "full" uniform, here is a checklist/inspection sheet for determining correct wear:

https://filestore.scouting.org/filestore/pdf/510-784(23)-Scouts-Uniform-Inspection-Sheet.pdf

Incentivize the behavior you want.  If the PLC wants "full" uniform, then have an inspection, and give some awesome prizes for the three (or more??) Scouts who score the highest in whatever criteria the PLC has elected.

Also just did a 5 day, four night, 50+ miler backpacking/hiking trip about three hours from our home location, into the near-Catskills.  We ran another unit-level Kodiak Challenge course. 

Total cost per person for 9 people, including covering gas and tolls for drivers? (not including awards for Scouts, which came out of the Troop budget)

$100.08

Just now, DuctTape said:

Boiling water is an excellent sanitizer. Remember the mesh dunk bags?

In general the bulky 3 bin assembly line washing stations are some of the most unsanitary methods I have ever witnessed. IMO, It is better to have scouts individually clean their own stuff separately.  This becomes the norm anyway in backpacking situations, so why not have only a singular process. 

@DuctTape for National Commissioner!

Totally agree.  Well, I'd go a bit further and say use boiling water as a "sterilizer".

3 hours ago, yknot said:

I'm not aware of anything BSA does.

Ask you for more money and treat you like dirt?

16 minutes ago, Eagle94-A1 said:

I know some COs had no problem with parents taking YPT, getting a background check by the BSA, and registering as an  MBC. We were told that MBCs also underwent a background check.

I had this "discussion" with Michael Johnson some years back (2018).

I still have the email...  my question was about MBCs attending an event over 72 hours (back when that rule was in place).

My question was this:

Given the following:

1.  BSA requires registration for MBC's in order to complete a background check

2.  The state of PA also requires a PA State Police Criminal Record check, a PA Department of Human Services Child Abuse History check, and an Affidavit of Residence Over 10 Years in the State (or an FBI Fingerprint Check if not in PA 10 years or more)

3.  The COR approves the individual.

4.  There will be at least two unit-registered adult leaders on the outing.

Then why must they pay an additional registration fee, when BSA will accomplish no further actions?

His reply was that my question was an attempt '...to evade BSA's registration and selection process...'

Which, of course, it was nothing of the kind.  It was an attempt to evade burdensome registration fees  and additional unproductive nonsensical paperwork 😛 

1 minute ago, Eagle94-A1 said:

Yet the MBCs  cannot camp.

This one baffles me.  Except from the COR standpoint.  That is, your COR has an absolute say over who participates in their Scouting program.  But, if you clear it with your COR, then I don't see the issue. 

9 minutes ago, cmd said:

Our council just increased our insurance fee from $6 to $20, and extended that to include MBCs.  So that has jumped from $0 to $45 this year.  That's a lot to ask someone to pay for the POSSIBILITY of someone asking to do a merit badge with them. 

An organization my husband is part of asked him to become a MBC because they had a troop asking them if they could supply one with the program they were signing up for.  But the process of vetting him as a MBC took 3-4 months and that program had long since passed by the time they approved him, and no one else has asked to work with him. If he had paid for that exclusive, it would be even more irksome! 

I really don't understand the reasoning behind the current version of the weird 2nd class MBC membership status.  Are they really costing us the same as all leaders, but being somewhat subsidized?  With restricted privileges so we're only subsidizing the ones who are unlikely to pay full price to join? I could accept that reasoning if they admitted that was the goal, but all I've heard is lawyer-blaming. 

A big piece of the MB role in the program is giving youth a reason to call an adult they don't already know and ask them to work together.  That seems like the obvious role for a groomer to step into.  If a person is safe enough to meet with my child in a MBC role, they're safe enough to camp with us, so I don't buy the official arguments about it. 

 

Our solution: have adults in the unit register as the counselor for as many MBs as they .  Then, have Scouts invite "guest" instructors in when you are having that piece of program.  When complete, you sign off the reqs as MBC.

This still does not quite meet the "Adult Association" method you were talking about... having the Scout learn to make arrangements for a MB with a new person.  (Because we usually do these in small group settings, so only one Scout is making the guest arrangements.)

Also, I have talked with several leaders in other units who say they just invite the "guests" to do the instruction, then sign off the MBs in Scoutbook, without being an MBC.  No, this does not meet the intent or design of the program, IMO, but the practice is underway...

3 minutes ago, Delphinus said:

I noticed that the fees on the Boy Scout side have gone up significantly this year based on an email notification a month or so ago.. Assistant Scoutmaster registration prices have increased about 50% this year, and Merit Badge Counselors, people who volunteer and freely donate their time and expertise, have gone from no fee to an annual $25 fee for the opportunity to volunteer their time. This will make it far LESS likely that people will volunteer. I'll help out as an ASM and merit badge counselor for a couple of years, but I am trying to get our son to get through the program and "Eagle Out" sooner. Once he does, my freely donated time and expertise will end. 

Not enough to volunteer my time, energy, and expertise, or even that I pay for that privilege, but now the price to pay to volunteer is going up? 

I think BSA does not really know what side their bread is buttered on.

IMO, fewer adult volunteers will only mean fewer Scouts for the membership rolls.

1 hour ago, mrjohns2 said:

Ah! Good. Which kind do you use? We couldn’t find any that seemed to be “designed” for dishes, but since we found the others, we stopped looking. 

BTF Chlor Tabs   https://www.webstaurantstore.com/national-chemicals-inc-13002-btf-chlor-tab-bar-glass-sanitizer-tablet-100-count/99913002A.html

We have a volunteer who runs a restaurant supply...  he gets them wholesale, and donates when needed. 

Check with your local restaurant supply... they might sell them at cost to a Scout Troop. 

One tablet per wash basin of rinse water, marked to two gallons, which gives more than 100 ppm minimum for recommended (depends on which source you use) chlorine concentration.  I think the bottle says 1 tab per 2 1/2 gal water gives 100 ppm.  Scouts will often not fill to the basin mark, but that just makes the concentration stronger, which I am OK with. 

As long as they keep the sanitizing water "clean" this solution lasts all day, so could be good for three meals.  I think directions say good for 24 hours?? 

BTW, tossing out dishwater ought to go like this...

1.  Rainbow toss your rinse water.

2.  Screen gunk out of wash water (we use old window screen) while pouring into empty rinse basin.  This goes in garbage...

3.  Rainbow toss  wash water.

4.  Pour half your sanitize water in each empty basin.  Let sit for a few minutes. 

5.  Rainbow toss.  Now all basins are clean.  (If your wash basin was especially yucky, dump out the wash basin first, then use the sanitize water from the rinse basin for a second soak.)

Postscript:  Advertised price for BTF puts them at about 27 cents per tablet.

Steramine advertised on Amazon is 6 cents per tablet (with Prime).  1 tab per gallon.  Might be a more thrifty solution if you have to buy.  (Don't know how long solution lasts.  I do not want to dive down the rabbit hole of test strips. 😛 )

Post-postscript:  Dishes usually aren't the culprit when things go bad.  Two highest causes of gastro problems are unwashed hands, and poor food prep practices.  Your time is better spent teaching/supervising those than worrying about bleach or ammonia concentrations!

3 hours ago, mrjohns2 said:

It sounds like you are not following your own advice. We don’t bring bleach, but you said that your troop does. Hummmm…..

Ahhh... I see how I got things crossed up for you...

@DannyG mentioned Steramine specifically.... so I was responding to that.  And yes @T2Eagle, Steramine is a quaternary ammonium product, so do not use with chlorine bleach.

We bring bleach tablets.

Apologize for the disorganized thoughts...

59 minutes ago, mrjohns2 said:

Tablets. Easy to get on Amazon. It seems that the health departments are more on the ammonia tablets as well. 

Word of advice... Use one or the other in your Troop kit... never bring both.  You are asking for trouble if Scouts mix bleach tablets with ammonia products.

Ever hear of chloramine??  https://www.healthline.com/health/bleach-and-ammonia

Be advised, with either tablets or liquid bleach, you must make sure you are using it in accordance with the label. 

For example, this product, Evolve, available at WalMart, 

https://www.evolveproducts.com/product/evolve-ultra-concentrated-bleach-tablets-32-count/

specifically says, "NOT FOR SANITIZATION OR DISINFECTION"

Steramine, however, https://www.sanitize.com/products/

says "For Sanitizing Food Contact Surfaces"

Do your homework...

Also, make sure you are using a product consistent with the manufacturers instructions.  With liquid bleach, for example, a rose is not a rose IS NOT a rose.

Take the Clorox Liquid Bleach line, for instance.   You must be careful.   They have at least five different liquid bleach products on the market:

No-Splash Formula (do not use!!)  (For laundry and non-porous surfaces only)

Outdoor Bleach (do not use!!) (this is concentrated stuff... not for use on your dishes)

Disinfecting Bleach (you can use this one!!)   the label says "To Sanitize Food-Contact Surfaces"

- They recommend using this one... https://www.clorox.com/learn/how-to-sanitize-dishes-with-bleach/

- You can also purify water with this one...  https://www.clorox.com/learn/water-purification-how-much-bleach-purify-water-for-drinking/

Performance Bleach (you can use this one!!) the label says "To Sanitize Food-Contact Surfaces"

Germicidal Bleach (you can use this one!!)  the label says "To Sanitize Food-Contact Surfaces"

Of course, never use a scented bleach product on your dishes...  yes, they'll be lemony fresh, or lavendery (?) fresh, but those chemicals left behind on your dishes are not for consumption!!

We use tablets for the most part, but we have a small bottle of liquid bleach in the trailer as a backup for when the QM hasn't checked to see if we have adequate tablets 😜 (This is a health and safety issue, so we intervene here...)

For backpacking, we try to plan meals requiring no dishes.  We ask our Scouts to bring a metal spoon and cup.  Boil water in your metal cup to sterilize it.  Spoons get dipped in boiling water for sterilizing.

Here's a primer for more info: https://foodsafepal.com/approved-sanitizers-foodservice/

Bottom line:  "sanitize" means reducing pathogens to safe levels..., "disinfect" means kills all or most..., "sterilize" means kills all!!!

Washing dishes and washing hands... two of the most difficult habits to inculcate in youth AND ADULTS!!

I could tell you horror stories of military units in the field who didn't do these properly, either.

14 hours ago, DougJ said:

Apparently some medals were collected and destroyed and a new medal produced

I can confirm they were recalled by National.  Three different supply shop managers confirmed this.  And, you could not order one from scoutstuff.org until within the last few days.

The current picture posted at scoutstuff is the same as old medal...  except old medal stock number was 610646.  There is a new stock number now.

https://www.scoutshop.org/national-medal-for-outdoor-achievement-award-660210.html

Has anyone ordered one of the new, to see what change was made, if any?

If they did not make any changes, then it begs the question, why was it recalled, and unavailable for order for nigh on a year?

3 hours ago, BigCubr said:

The Sea Base (and others, I think) program guide gives weight limit tables by height. Is there any factoring for fitness? I know I have weight to lose, but even in my heyday of running (very slowly!) half ironmans, I was never under 250lbs, which is +20 over the tables. I completely understand the logic for safety reasons, etc.

So, do I spend money on a personal trainer to get fit-but-still-fat, a surgeon to amputate a leg to lose enough weight, or a therapist to get over missing this chance with my kid?

I am, of course, joking about the amputation. It all comes down to: How strict are they on the weight tables?

 

Thanks

It isn't necessarily about your fitness.  It's about others having to haul you out of a remote location if you are injured.

17 minutes ago, fred8033 said:

 I just don't believe BSA had any more responsibility than the rest of society. 

Not a legal responsibility, but a moral one.

7 hours ago, skeptic said:

If we are to make a comment, can we use the right spelling please.  Naught is another word for zero, pronounced not, or knot.  Still, I suggest this is not a good reason to knot up our emotiona, as it really really a naught sum discussion.  I suppose though we might at times be naughty and make waves.  Perhaps we need to have our backsides smacked with a knotty pine paddle.

What is the optimum speed in knots for that smack from a nautical implement? 😜 

Get a Special Power of Attorney... many are free to download.  Or, just find an example for your state on the interweb thingy...

Get parent signature notarized.  Two copies.  One for you, one for unit.  Bob's your uncle...

Might save you a headache down the road.

Here's a free one... so they say... https://www.rocketlawyer.com/sem/power-of-attorney-for-child

2 hours ago, InquisitiveScouter said:

The result?  The image is tarnished, and the membership roles have fallen.

I am so sorry... In my haste, I completely excluded the paramount result: more kids were abused!!

Please forgive my oversight.

3 hours ago, yknot said:

If an organization that is supposed to represent the very best in moral leadership couldn't collectively figure out what the right thing to do was no matter what the times, then I don't think it should have been marketing or presenting itself as such to America's families. Parents weren't trusting their sons to Men Who Camp in the Woods With Boys, they were trusting Boy Scouts of America, and all that they believed that implied: Honor. Duty. Morally Straight, etc., etc. 

This is the real crux of the issue.  BSA executives, at the time, knew they had a problem within the organization, but did not make a clarion call for policies to intervene.  They chose to keep the trends they were seeing private, and protect the image and posterity of the organization, rather than take aggressive action to protect the children under their umbrella.

The IVF files, then, became the double-edged sword.  While it was a method for excluding perpetrators, it was a mechanism to keep the trends "in house", instead of bringing them into the light of day.  Their fear was that by bringing the issues to light, the BSA image would fail, and the membership roles would plummet.  They are now hoist with their own petard, as the files showed the trends that were kept hidden.  The result?  The image is tarnished, and the membership roles have fallen.

Illegal?  No. 

Unethical?  You bet. 

Morally straight?  Not in my book.

On 8/31/2023 at 11:58 AM, mrjohns2 said:

I think it is to eliminate “outsiders” that have no other connection to scouting besides merit badges. Quite the change from when I was a youth in the ‘80s. 

Yes, I think this will lead to a little more isolation of Scouting from the community at large.  We have several MBCs locally that have nothing to do with Scouting other than being a MBC.

We do have a few parents who signed up to counsel who are now dropping, after their kid finished Eagle.  At least they counseled several other Scouts on the badges the were signed up for, instead of only for their own kid. 

Still think the optics on that will be really bad if word gets around, but it won't come from me 😜

47 minutes ago, Aarav said:

Hi ,

          Does volunteering for  community bike event  counts towards conservation service hours. Please advice.

What is the purpose of the community bike event?  Was it to raise money to support environmental efforts in the community?

These things are often a judgement call on the part of the leader approving the service.  Or, better yet, take it to the PLC.

Happy Scouting!