mrkstvns

I would first do the basic online courses on myscouting, then find a local "classroom" IOLS course (Introduction to Outdoor Leadership Skills). If you can't find it locally, you might be able to find it at your troop's summer camp --- most offer some adult learning activities, and IOLS might be one. After you do the position-specific training and IOLS, you will be deemed "Trained". Now it's time to start looking into more advanced training (including Wood Badge).

Ingenious! I might have to let the SPL chastise that scout, but deep in my heart, he'd be my new favorite scout....the kind who can think outside the box.

Yes, I would be quite upset if I found that a scout violated a standing troop rule, ignored his SPL's specific pre-camp instructions, and brought a cell phone to camp. I think our SPL would be quite within his rights to assign that scout to a couple days of latrine cleaning duty.

You're right, the requirement does say it can be done on a trail hike, but it also says that the scout is to cook 2 meals on that trip....but that's not too tough to manage.

Our troop has the same rule. After my son earned his Star rank he made me take him to REI to buy the same small, lightweight tent that his friends got. No rule telling them what kind of tent to get, but fitting in with your peers is evidently its own motivation. Now if he were a hipster like me, he'd buy a heavy army surplus tent....

I am joking...but yeah, it would be REALLY cool to camp with horses. There's a Cavalcade trek at Philmont that lets you do just that, and close to home (for me), the Sid Richardson Scout Ranch does a horse camp, but the BEST horse adventure I'm aware of in BSA is run by Cascade Pacific Council. They do a high adventure trek where you ride 165 miles over 8 days. Info is here: https://www.cpcbsa.org/horses

Nope. Did it several years ago. I just occasionally bump into the odd nuance (like shirt colors) that makes me stop and think about boundaries, definitions, and philosophies. Oh, dear! I was thinking of people who study, observe, and learn about the environment over a lifetime (regardless of education credentials, certificates, etc.) Kind of like this definition: https://www.environmentalscience.org/career/naturalist I'm not trying to berate people (or even really to change anyone's mind), rather, simply raise the point and let people ponder it on occasion and

I suppose it depends on where in California you camp. In Yosemite, there are definitely bears and they have been known to rip up tents, rip the roof of convertibles, and break into steel toolboxes in pickup truck beds to get at food. The National Park Service now provides reinforced steel lockers where campers can store their coolers. Had a great camping trip in Banff National Park in Canada. They had a lot bears there too, and they had the same kind of lockers as Yosemite, where campers could secure their food from marauding bears. They also required trash to be quickly deposited

As you may know from the multiple threads in this Forum, there are official guidelines for BSA uniforms, an official guide to placement and appropriateness of badges etc., and. there is even an official uniform inspection form, complete with scoring system and notes for feedback to individual scouts. The uniform is one of the "methods" of scouting and Scoutmaster position training these days includes a module about the uniform per BSA guidelines. It has me curious.....does anybody really USE the inspection form or demand adherence to the guidelines? I constantly see scouts wearing n

I hear that Aldi sells knock-offs of all the popular Girl Scout cookie flavors. I might have to give 'em a try.

Here in Texas, many of our state parks don't have trees bigger than cacti and scrub mesquite. Tough to hang a hammock. Not really a problem though, since we just lay our bedrolls out on the ground near our horses. Naturally, we make sure kids sleep next to kids and horses their own ages and we always have at least 2 female horses in any girl troop.

There's some good ideas in this thread... I particularly like the LAST of those 4 bullet points (web site with form-based editing) for several reasons: It doesn't assume or require scouts to pony up a lot of money (Microsoft Word is common, but a license can be expensive) It doesn't require creating an account anywhere or being forced to agree to onerous or unethical "Terms of Service" (Google doc might be free, but Google/Gmail account info is just as hackable and exploitable as Facebook, and corporate data abuses just as likely, even though it is true that Facebook seems to

It saddens me to think that my past donations to GSUSA might be wasted on fat legal fees instead of on programs and equipment that actually help girls learn and grow into competent, confident young women. I sure am going to miss those Thin Mints next year when I have to politely say "No" to the first girl to ask me for a cookie order...

How often does that particular scenario really happen? In most troops, the largest age group is the 11-12 year old. They're the most eager to go on campouts and the most flexible about helping out their fellow scouts. In our troop, we usually get at least 10 new 10-11 year olds joining each year. There's almost always enough to pair up a newcomer with a scout who is the same (or close) in age. The older scouts tend to be the ones who are less willing to tent with anyone but their friend.

Most troops already do that, and I doubt there is a scoutmaster on this forum who would not bend over backwards to help any kid who really had a problem or issue. In our own troop, probably at least HALF the campouts have no campfire. That's not always by design, it just works out that way because our state is often plagued by drought so we get "burn bans". We also don't do campfires on backpacking trips. On advanced backpacker trips (longer with LNT practices used), we might practice a "campfire alternative", like using candle lanterns (this works well with small groups, like patr

Nice article! It's a credit to the organization that they'd have a female scoutmaster just a scant year after BSA was founded.

Hard and fast rules are asinine. No doubt about it. But all adults should be aware of the rules, think about why they might be in place, and do their best to observe the spirit of the rules to the extent it benefits the boys. There are absolutely situations where the "2 year rule" won't work for a particular campout or for a particular troop (I suspect they are particularly onerous on small troops where you might not have enough scouts to buddy up a given age). There might be solutions that work though: like have buddy pairs in most tents, but 3 scouts in one....or letting an older scou

Since we evidently won't all agree on a perfect mode of outdoor dress, here's a rather, errr, immodest proposal. Everyone should always be buck naked whenever they're outdoors! That way NOBODY can complain about what color your shirt might be...problem solved!

You rebel! Simplified workbook....ONE signature page....where does the insanity end? Next thing we know, you'll be advocating that EBORs focus on the SUBSTANCE of a scout's project and recognizing their SUCCESS after a long road to Eagle instead of their time-honored practice of spotlighting typos in the application and worrying about whether or not National updated the workbook version number. After all, what life lesson could possibly be more important than perfect paperwork?

Of course not. And many of y'all are missing the point of the whole discussion. There is absolutely NOTHING inherently wrong with any particular color. A color is just a color. The point is that all of us can stand to better understand all 7 of the Leave No Trace principles and to think about how our outdoor manners affect the environment around us. Usually that means respecting life: the flora and fauna we find outdoors. Point 7 is a bit different. It says "Be considerate of other visitors" That means we're talking about people. Two parties: you and whoever you encounter

And the closer we get to annihilating life on this planet, the sooner we'll get to find out if you are right.

I suppose it depends on what you call an "outdoorsman". If you just mean people who like going on weekend campouts in state parks, then maybe so. But I'm referring to people who are naturalists. Or backcountry adventurers. Some of those people do, indeed, like bright colors....after all, taste is very individual. But aside from personal likes and dislikes, they understand the reasons why most serious outdoor enthusiasts refrain from wearing loud colors in the context of a natural environment. They can like whatever they want, but they respect nature, harmony, and the importance of courtesy t

They could call it "Bloody Traitor Day".

Not at all!! I'm simply observing what is generally true. Just walk through any outdoor store in the world. I'll bet you find a WHOLE lot more camo jackets and khaki shirts than you do brilliant yellow and red shirts... Similarly, I find that serious auto mechanics tend to have a lot of wrenches...

Howdy MattR! Ya got your heart in the right place, but y'all friends across the pond can't really be trusted to do barbecue. Good barbecue is a work of art. It takes hours and hours of slow smoking with just the right spices, just the right kind of wood and just the right amount of humidity in that smoke. It is not a skill that can be mastered by a new chef reading a few quick messages in a Scouting Form....not in any way that entitles such a dish to be rightly called "Barbecue". If you want to call your meat covered in sugary sauce a " barbecue", by all means, slap together some q