FireStone

Pure speculation. And yet this is exactly the kind of thing that people are hanging their hats on when saying that some "majority" thinks one thing or another. Can we at least stop with the idea that any one of us knows what the majority believes?

This. All day. Yes. 👍🏼

That's just not true. It's a popular opinion that girls should be in Scouting. How popular? I don't know. But it's not some small fringe group.

Again, where's the data to support that? You're calling someone a liar based on what? Your gut feeling that the numbers aren't there?

Certainly. I'm not happy with the survey and how it was conducted either. But a bad survey doesn't mean there's no support for girls in Scouting. The idea that it's "all lies" is simply not true.

What minority? What data says that either opinion was the minority opinion?

Agreed. I keep reading that no one wanted this. I guess when local scouters (myself included) were writing letters and making phone calls to advocate for this years ago, we just imagined doing all of that. When my committee sat around a table and did an informal "show of hands" poll of who was in favor of this and 7 out of 8 of us raised our hands, I guess that was just my imagination. The apparent notion that people wanting this simply don't exist is baffling. I don't have any data to show that it was the majority opinion, but I also don't see how anyone can believe that it being a popu

If they did one book with combined photos of boys and girls, the complaints here would be the same. I'm honestly surprised that there isn't more support for separate books from the single-gender-scouting crowd. This supports the idea of separate troops entirely, doesn't it? A single merged book looks more like co-ed scouting.

This kind of is the big story right now. Not sure why anyone would expect any different coverage. In fact I think it would be weird if it were done any differently.

We're among the group of adults in kids' lives who might know something about kids before their own parents do. Coaches, teachers, similarly are in these same positions. We see kids outside of their homes, away from their parents where they might do and say things that they wouldn't disclose in front of their parents. The bottom line for me is that I'm not going to put myself in a position of possibly disclosing something to a parent that a scout hasn't already disclosed. It doesn't help the kid if I do that, and it might even harm the kid. Such was the case here, https://www.huffingtonp

No one said you have to explain anything. I've been referencing the public school model (local to me anyway) and how they handle it, and I think it's a good approach. Respect the wishes of the kid, if questions come up, refer said questions appropriately to counselors, staff, parents, etc. If you feel compelled to dive into such a broad discussion on gender when asked to simply refer to a Scout by a different name, I guess that's your choice. But I wouldn't recommend it. Certainly wouldn't be what I would do.

I'm not picking and choosing anything. There is nothing dishonest about coming to grips with telling their parents about their sexual orientation or gender identity and doing so at a time that they are comfortable with. There is no violation of the Scout Law in that.

Why then was there no concern about Cub books being co-ed in terms of photos and representations? Those packs/dens are also supposed to be separate, right? It's such a weird thing to bother with. Either it's a problem or it's not. And yet we get this seemingly split perspective on it from National. Or maybe that makes total sense considering the source. 😅

Not to their parents necessarily. From what my wife has told me, kids are far more likely to openly discuss their sexual orientation or gender identity among friends and even teachers than they are parents. There's a lot of baggage that goes with coming out to their parents. That's a big life-changing event. Come out to a friend or teacher and if it doesn't go well, that's a relationship that you don't have to live with forever. Come out to your parents and not get the reaction you hoped for, and that's entirely different.

Is there any documented maximum allowable time from when a SM conference is requested to when one of given to the Scout? I'm not aware of anything but wondering if it's written somewhere. Like "a troop must make a conference date/time available to the Scout within no more than 60 days from request" or something like that?

EDITED TO ADD: Upon further information provided, my concern is invalid.

That was never rational, not then, not ever. And you're talking about abuse. What we're discussing here is not. No one is saying "what happens in school stays in school." Our teachers are being directed to not out kids when it comes to gender identity and sexual orientation. It's not their job to do so, and it's overstepping into territory that they have no business in, specifically that of making life-changing declarations to parents about their kids when those kids aren't ready to face their parents with yet. They can talk to parents about whatever name their kid has asked to be ref

You really believe parents would be the first to know? Most kids find it hardest to come out to their parents more than anyone else. There is a myriad of data and information out there about this, and piles of articles about helping kids come out to their parents, for the very reason that is is so intimidating, stressful, and challenging. My wife and my mother (also a life-long teacher) have had students confide in them about their sexuality long before they were able to do so with their parents. No one is saying make the parents last to know. Just not to put Scouting volunteers in th

It's not how it's done here, but hypothetically if the student were present, the same rules would still apply for the teacher. Don't disclose anything about gender identity or sexual orientation revelations by the student. Simply say that Johnny has asked to be called "Pat", and that staff have respected that request.

A student wouldn't be at a parent/teacher conference. But if it comes up at a conference that Johnny is referred to as Pat, teachers are advised to simply inform parents that they abide by students' requests to be called a different name if requested in earnest. They don't need to say anything about any other specifics, any revelations the student may have made to that teacher, to other students, etc. In fact, the directive from administrators in my wife's school district is that they are forbidden to disclose anything about that stuff with parents, like any disclosures about sexual

What if the kid hasn't come out to their parents with their gender identity? Their sexual orientation? Is it our place to potentially "out" a kid to their parents? I don't think we should have any role in that dynamic between a youth and their parents. That's a monumental moment for people, revealing something like that to their parents. Many kids come out to friends, teachers, other adults before their parents because it's such a stressful and intimidating thing to do. Who are we to reveal that info to parents, even if it is inadvertent? And save it with the "normal" and "rational

That's not what the mental health pros are saying, not in the training they are providing to teachers in my area, so I'm going to go with them on this one.

I'm kind of assuming here, but my understanding is that you're not a mental health professional, is that right? Because what you are calling "abuse" is actually what mental health professionals are advising teachers here in NJ to do with students who identify as a gender other than their birth gender, and is prescribed as the best course of action for a student's mental health.

I just asked my middle school teacher wife, her having just gone through a whole training session on gender identity. She was told that legally (here in NJ at least) teachers are required by law to refer to a student by the gender that they identify as. They do not have to talk to the parents (it's in line with "outing" a student and teachers aren't allowed to do that), or if a parent asks that they refer to their child as one gender and the student asks to be referred to as another gender, they have to defer to the student's wishes. Now that's public school, not scouting. But an interes

Weeks, preferably. A month is even reasonable. I was referring specifically to the "must be done on a camping trip" requirement when I mentioned adding time, which if adhered to could add months, sometimes several months, to a Scout's advancement path. As is the case in the original poster's son's predicament, not being able to get a conference until November under this policy. What if said Scout gets sick the week of that November trip? Now it's December at best, if the Troop camps every month. If they don't, January? February? See where I'm going with this? If there is flexibilit