Jump to content

NJCubScouter

Moderators
  • Content Count

    7405
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

Posts posted by NJCubScouter

  1. 2 minutes ago, Oldscout448 said:

    and I thought I was the only one who remembered that ad from the 60s.     It made quite the impression on all the kids on my block.    

    I suspect there are a number of others here who remember it.  All you have to do is be of the right, um, vintage, and involved in Scouting as a youth.  :)

  2. 5 minutes ago, Peter1919 said:

    Ok interesting where you guys have taken the discussion.

    As you spend more time in this forum you will see that threads often go in "interesting" directions, sometimes 10-15 different directions simultaneously in a single thread.   Quite often all it takes is one phrase that really has nothing to do with the actual topic, and we're off to the races.  :)

    5 minutes ago, Peter1919 said:

    So in the UK we don't just have Bear Grylls as Chief Scout we also have some more minor celebs as Scouting Abassadors. Sometimes they do events by themselves other times the accomany Bear to things. What they all do is help get publicity for Scouting...

    I did not know that.  Can you give some examples, not necessarily names that we on the other side of the pond probably would not recognize, but the kinds of fields they are in or something else to give us an idea of what kind of people these are.

    5 minutes ago, Peter1919 said:

    we have been fairly succesful in the last 12 years or so on getting fairly regular national news coverage of Scouting, most usually on breakfast news programmes where they like a good news story,...

    Now see, right there is an example of where I could say something in response that would send this thread ricocheting off into parts unknown.  But as George H.W. Bush may or may not have ever actually said, "Not gonna do it.  Wouldn't be prudent."

  3. 56 minutes ago, oldbuzzard said:

    All those Marine Corp ads, including the infamous magma demon ad, weren't about relating to celebraties, but about  doing stuff. Folks who can reflect doing stuff should be better than those who are "famous".

    "Follow the Rugged Road", anyone?

  4. Well, I have never heard of Chris Pratt.  I take it that I am in a minority in this regard, but the fact is that I am woefully (but mostly intentionally) deficient in my knowledge of celebrities in general, especially a lot of people who have become movie or tv stars in the last 30 or 40 years.  I take it he has been in one or more of the recent "superhero" movies.  The only one of those that I have ever seen (not counting older incarnations of Superman and Batman) is Iron Man, and I didn't see any of the sequels, if there were any.

    There have been a few times in the past few years when the first time I heard of a celebrity, who everybody else seemed to know all about, is when they passed away.  I'm mostly talking about people who did not die of old age.

  5. 27 minutes ago, Hawkwin said:

    There is a long list of Eagle celebrities. One of them might be a better fit:

    https://blog.scoutingmagazine.org/2018/02/08/bsa-turning-108-heres-list-108-famous-former-scouts/

    I see quite a few on that list that would bring a lot of media attention as well as new applicants. Chris Pratt would be at or near the top of that list.

    A lot of people on that list are deceased.  And some are, perhaps, how shall I put this delicately, especially since I am not all that far behind them, perhaps a little TOO "experienced at life" to be a really effective public image for the BSA.

    On the other hand, how about "Bill Gates, Chief Scout"?  I hear he's got some free time on his hands these days.  But I can already hear the complaining from some quarters, and I am not actually serious.  

    And I still don't think its a good idea in general, but going through the names is still interesting.  I didn't know Jay Leno was a Scout.  But not the Chief Scout.  :D

  6. 39 minutes ago, David CO said:

    My character and camping skills were already pretty well formed before I became a scoutmaster (at age 25).

    I think being a leader does have a positive effect on most people.  Most people can always improve their abilities to deal with other people, to assess situations and respond, to deal with difficult situations and difficult people, etc.  Work and professional life provides some experience in doing so, but volunteering and working with kids provides a different kind of experience.  Additionally, most of us here are not trained as teachers, so we learn how to pass along our knowledge and experience to young people only through practice in doing so.  I also agree with what someone, I think it was EagleDad, said earlier: I think being a Scout leader has made me a better parent as well.  It is not so much a matter of "character" and "Scout skills" as some of the less tangible things that I mention above.

    • Like 1
  7. I don't think the answer (to what question, I am not sure) lies in recruiting someone to be the "face" of the BSA.  For one thing, look at Bear Grylls and the UK.  What I have learned in this thread is that a significant number of people seem to think he's a fraud.  (I have never really paid attention to Bear Grylls, and the only episode of his show I have ever seen was the one with President Obama, which I doubt was representative of his shows as a whole.)  So if he is viewed as a fraud by a significant number of people, how does that help the image of Scouts UK?

    I also doubt that the answer lies in recruiting even a "real adventurer" if 99.9 % of people have never heard of him. 

    Mike Rowe usually gets mentioned in these conversations, but based on the article he wrote recently, he seems (at best) skeptical of the direction the BSA is going in, so he is probably not what National is looking for.

    As for anyone else, well, you have to be careful these days.  You're talking about taking an established organization and putting its public image in the hands of one person.  Presumably that person would have a squeaky-clean image when he (and I am assuming it would be a he) is selected.  Then the next week, the ex-secretary, the ex-wife, the ex-girlfriend-on-the-side, whoever, come forward telling stories that make the man's image not so squeaky-clean anymore.  It's a real risk these days, and it wouldn't help the BSA any.

    • Upvote 2
  8. 3 minutes ago, Terasec said:

    alpine on the NY/NJ border is indeed in NJ, but owned by greater NY council, 

    Alpine is the NYC councils cub scout camp, Ten Mile River is their Boy scout camp

    Oh.  You're right.  See, this is what happens when you only look at what shows up on a Google search results page and don't look at the actual page.

    I did go to Ten Mile River for summer camp one year when I was a Scout, actually it was one week of regular summer camp and one week of TLD (the 1970's predecessor of NYLT.)

  9. 32 minutes ago, Terasec said:

    our pack is currently boy only, but committee is trying to change that, also spoke with our council camp, all camp activities are being integrated to coed activities, they are revising cope games to eliminate all contact activities, 

    see your NJ, camp I am referring to is Alpine

    I am just curious , you say in the thread title that you are from NY, and your council camp is Camp Alpine, but Alpine is the council camp for the Northern New Jersey Council.  Does NNJC cross state lines?

    It turns out I was completely wrong, see below -- NJCS

    I know where Alpine is but have never been there.  I am in Patriots Path Council.

  10. 13 minutes ago, Terasec said:

    hoping to keep his scouting boy oriented but having a hard time with it now

    Do you mean because of the admittance of girls into some packs?  Does your son's pack have girls in it?

  11. On 6/3/2018 at 11:13 AM, cyphertext said:

    I think they would look more "squared away" if they were all wearing matching footwear.  With different colored sneakers, it doesn't look that good.

    That's right.  If you're going for a "look", you have to do it right or don't do it at all.

  12. Trail_on, welcome to the forum.

    I think we need a clearer time-line and some details of what happened here before people can give an opinion that is really relevant to the situation you are describing.  If you are asking whether something that happened while a person was not a registered leader can be used as a reason for denying them registration (or re-registration) as a leader, the answer is yes (as others have said.)

  13. 2 minutes ago, Sentinel947 said:

    @NJCubScouter 

    Look at that 14 year old typo! Oscar de la Hoya is a boxer, Oscar de la Renta made the 1990s-2000's uniform. =P

     

    I know.  I was quoting another poster.  The quoting in older posts no longer appears on the screen correctly.  I was actually pointing out that Oscar de la Hoya was a boxer.

    • Haha 1
  14. 14 hours ago, walk in the woods said:

    I don't believe the executive pubahs believe their resolution.  I think it looks like a blatent sop to try to settle the unrest and minimize the spread of damage.  So for those that believe the resolution I have some ocean front property in AZ.

     

    Ah. And the fact is that they did something similar at the time of at least one of the sexual-orientation decisions. But I think that while the timing probably is a “sop,” National really does believe in the “belief” requirement.  And no, I am not in the market for any oceanfront property, whether in AZ or in NJ (but for different reasons, in NJ the main reason is named Sandy.)

  15. 18 hours ago, walk in the woods said:

    I read the article and comments.  I'm reminded of the immortal words of George Strait

    I got some ocean front property in Arizona
    From my front porch you can see the sea
    I got some ocean front property in Arizona
    If you'll buy that I'll throw the golden gate in free

    I'm missing the connection.

  16. 42 minutes ago, Gwaihir said:

    technically he said Darth Vader betrayed and murdered your father. ;)

    Yeah, yeah.  :D  Which makes it even more misleading, since Obi Wan knew it didn't happen that way.  (I am trying to remain in the fictional universe here.  I know it's just a movie and that George Lucas simply changed his mind and made a weak attempt in Episode VI to reconcile it.)

    42 minutes ago, Gwaihir said:

    One could argue Obi-Wan meant the psychological murder of the soul known as Anakin.

    And that's basically what he (or actually his ghost) says in Episode VI, but the way he says it, it sounds like he knows he's full of baloney, as my mother would say.  And Luke knows it too.  As besides, his explanation (especially if you call it "pyschological murder") doesn't work because by the end of that same movie, the "soul" of Anakin returns - right before he dies, and again when he appears as a ghost. So I guess his soul wasn't really dead.  It was just hiding.  Or pining for the fjords.  Unless we are talking about resurrection here.

    42 minutes ago, Gwaihir said:

    Granted, I don't for a second believe Lucas originally intended for this, but in the context of the film, i see it as legitimate.  :)

    Well, I see it as a good try.

    • Haha 1
  17. 55 minutes ago, David CO said:

    Yes. Joining scouting can be a bit like reading all of the warnings and disclaimers on a medicine package. Knowing all the possible side-effects of a medicine can really discourage a person from taking it.

    I especially enjoy the pharmaceutical ads in which they are trying to sell you an asthma medicine where one of the possible side effects is that you may have trouble breathing.  Or a medicine to deal with digestive problems that may cause digestive problems.  (They don't say it exactly that way, of course, but that is what it adds up to.)  A related thing that amuses me is ads for both minor things (like a skin rash) and major things (like a medication for people who have already had a heart attack) both often have possible side effects that may be fatal.  I would be a little more likely to chance the fatal side effects if the thing I am trying to remedy (like having a second heart attack) is likely to be fatal all by itself.

    But if we are going to analogize this to the BSA, when you volunteer for the BSA they don't really tell you about the possible "side effects."  In days of yore it didn't matter as much, but now the BSA works overtime churning out rules and regulations and obscure "codes of conduct" to shift the potential cost of a problem from them to "us," and most of "us" (not counting people who read this forum) don't even know it.

  18. 2 minutes ago, Jameson76 said:

    That would depend on what you view as providing an engaging and challenging program.  To be fully compliant with the G2SS is possible, but that is sort of like building something in a major city, yes you can conform to the 600 pages of building codes, but is that even something you want to do?

    The problem is that you never know in advance which page that you skip (in the building code or the G2SS) is going to come back and bite you in the end - and in the wallet.

    • Upvote 1
  19. 59 minutes ago, David CO said:

    In the context of the movie, they referred to it as a religion in the first film. So I used that for the lack of a better word.

    They did.  Of course, in the first film they said Darth Vader killed Luke's father, and in the next film Darth Vader was Luke's father, and no amount of verbal gymnastics by the ghost of Obi Wan in the third film can reconcile that.  A certain point of view only goes so far.

    Not to mention the terrible thing the writers of the fourth movie (Episode I) did by turning the grand mystery of the Force into a matter of some bacteria-like things that you can measure with a blood test.  By the beginning of the new trilogy, apparently the midichlorians never existed.  Otherwise I have to believe that at some point, Rey would have been approached by a lab technician with a needle and a Band Aid...

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...