Jump to content

Council Relations

Discuss issues relating to Scout Councils, districts and working with professionals

609 topics in this forum

    • 95 replies
    • 6856 views
    • 60 replies
    • 5957 views
  1. Two Councils May Merge

    • 34 replies
    • 4887 views
    • 46 replies
    • 4697 views
    • 59 replies
    • 4643 views
    • 12 replies
    • 3761 views
    • 36 replies
    • 3744 views
  2. Problem DE

    • 63 replies
    • 3722 views
    • 29 replies
    • 3586 views
    • 36 replies
    • 3481 views
  3. Council spy?

    • 43 replies
    • 3480 views
    • 32 replies
    • 3332 views
    • 81 replies
    • 3330 views
    • 42 replies
    • 3323 views
    • 20 replies
    • 3157 views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • Hi @Saltface & @walk in the woods, Thanks for the thoughts.  I do get your points here. My personal feelings on the issue don't impact my perspective here.  Truth be told, I really dislike it when Scout leaders freelance on the rules in Scouting.  The Scoutmaster of my son's troop does that too much for my liking.  In fact, I'm stepping down as CC because I'm just tired of fighting with Scouters who want to apply only the rules that suit their needs.   Yet, I see a place for organized dissent.  I get the point that Scouts should follow rules, and I really do agree.  But, as long as it's done safely, I see a valid role for adults to advocate for causes that are important to their communities.  I saw in the earlier posts such an organized dissent.   We can certainly disagree on whether it's appropriate for a troop to openly lobby for a rules change by openly challenging the BSA.  I respect your perspectives here.  All the best.
       
    • I have been reluctant to reply as I was unable to attend NOAC.   I did however have a long conversation at last weekends Vigil inductions with a friend who has been performing / advising ceremonies  for over 40 years, and has often served as a NOAC  judge as well.    It seems there was a one hour seminar devoted to this subject, that ran almost three hours. So as best as my sleep deprived brain can recall...  National was receiving 4-6 phone calls or emails a month complaining of cultural theft.  That's 48-72 per year out of how many thousands of AoL ceremonies?  But this is National.    They seem to panic at any negative press now days.   So they decided to rework it and take it out of local hands.    The first draft was written by the two guys who rewrote the Brotherhood Ceremony a few years back.  Then it was handed off to the Cub Exec Committee.   Which is why, I guess,  it is such a " lame, corny " skit.  As well as a rather shameless plug for expensive high adventure camps.    The attendees were assured that there is no plan to change anything else.   Callouts, Ordeal, Brotherhood, and Vigil will remain as they are. Of course there was " no plan to let girls into Boy Scouts " either. Call me cynical  Oldscout PS.  So far, every scout on my team wants to go with a Standing Bear Productions  LLC model    
    • I apologize for suggesting a course of action that circumvents appropriate protocol. Obviously I'm ignorant of the Committee side of things and therefore shouldn't have put those 2 cents worth out there.
    • Again I'm not a lawyer, but is there implicit defamation? Say one applies to another youth organization and is asked, 1. Have you ever been rejected to serve in a volunteer organization? 2. If so why? I imagine the honest answers, Yes and I dunno would only add another rejection.
    • One of the better references that I've read was from a scout's older sister!
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×