Jump to content

Camping & High Adventure

Share a camping tip.


Subforums

  1. Equipment Reviews & Discussions

    Discussions dealing with equipment topics (tents, lights, packs, boots, stoves, etc.)

    4.6k
    posts
  2. Camp Recipes and Cooking

    Tales of Scout cooks, prized techniques and yummy recipes for gathering around the fire.

    342
    posts

1855 topics in this forum

    • 27 replies
    • 3.7k views
    • 27 replies
    • 1.6k views
  1. washing dishes 1 2

    • 26 replies
    • 2.4k views
  2. Hiking question 1 2

    • 26 replies
    • 906 views
    • 26 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 26 replies
    • 886 views
    • 26 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 26 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 26 replies
    • 1.1k views
  3. Beyond Wood Badge Mills 1 2

    • 26 replies
    • 939 views
    • 26 replies
    • 883 views
    • 26 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 26 replies
    • 4.1k views
    • 26 replies
    • 3.7k views
    • 25 replies
    • 961 views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • In this situation you did the correct thing by calling the police but were the two boys offered paid for counseling/therapy to help them overcome the trauma that they endured?  I wonder if they are now part of the 82,000 claimants? I also wonder how many other young boys did he abuse in and out of the BSA?  Unfortunately too often the acts were not interrupted and when they did come to light the abusers were not reported to the authorities.  In my personal situation at least 11 boys were suspected or known to have been abused but for some reason no one ever asked me.  
    • Circa 1980 a young(21) ASM was thankfully interrupted while doing extremely inappropriate things with two young (11) scouts.  Parents were called. Police were called. Council was called.  The parents refused to press charges, and tearfully begged the Scouters NOT to let any one else know. " For the boys sake"   So what were we to do?  Personally I wanted to beat the perp within an inch of his life, not just see him kicked out of Scouting.  But I figured that the parents had the right to have the first crack at him, and if they declined in order to protect their children from the social stigma which was sadly the case for victims back then, then I had no right to   
    • The files were kept secret until 2012 when the Oregon Supreme Court ordered them to made public.  That is only 9 years ago.  Was it a different time in 1981, or 1991, or 2001, or 2011?  The Boy Scouts of America did not advocate to it's membership to go to the police when knowledge of abuse happened period. There were congressional hearings in 1973 and child sexual abuse was part of the hearing.  Yes in the latest incident with the videotaping the police were called but I would bet you donuts to dollars if the pressure wasn't on the BSA it would have been covered up like so many other incidents.  One other thing I would like to say is please do not use the line "at the expense, for the most part. the current youth in the program".  In my opinion it makes the current youth to be victims of the survivors when if anything what the are losing is due to the past and recent leadership of the BSA.
    • For the most part, this subject was hushed and Not discussed, and authorities also chose to not believe or make excuses because so and so was a good guy, as most knew.  Parents often chose to not press the issue due to the embarrassment and community tendency to call it he said, he said or it is a kid making things up.  It was not right, but that was the world most of us live in.  Now, when it did actually get beyond the disbelief and was taken seriously, the laws were not yet particularly strong, and reinforced to some extent the idea of not believing.  Again, unless their was absolute proof, it was not taken as seriously as it should have been, just like rape of women and even spousal abuse.  So, today, we are trying to fix something that cannot be fixed, and doing it at the expense, for the most part. the current youth in the program, and even the mental state of the victims.  I think that it what most of us that are so awful are referring to as different standards.  None of us thinks it should have been brushed aside, but few thought about it the way it is looked at today.  Bye, no more attempt to explain.
    • Not at all because your point, which was to say I didn’t want a reply, was inaccurate. It’s seems to me you’re having a lovely conversation with yourself, serious or otherwise. From past experience, I’m using humor to diffuse not the seriousness of my replies or to diminish you, but to mask the degree of upset I have with your presumptions and mind reading. I asked if there was something else we’ve yet to hear. Simple question and others are asking it, as well. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...