Jump to content

Camping & High Adventure

Sign in to follow this  

Share a camping tip.

Subforums

  1. Equipment Reviews & Discussions

    Discussions dealing with equipment topics (tents, lights, packs, boots, stoves, etc.)

    4459
    posts
  2. Camp Recipes and Cooking

    Tales of Scout cooks, prized techniques and yummy recipes for gathering around the fire.

    280
    posts

1787 topics in this forum

  1. Military Type Equipment

    • 53 replies
    • 1711 views
    • 53 replies
    • 4353 views
    • 52 replies
    • 1475 views
    • 51 replies
    • 1012 views
    • 51 replies
    • 3400 views
    • 51 replies
    • 2294 views
    • 50 replies
    • 2475 views
    • 50 replies
    • 1532 views
  2. When is enough enough

    • 50 replies
    • 818 views
  3. National Permits

    • 49 replies
    • 841 views
    • 49 replies
    • 1152 views
  4. Camp coffee making

    • 49 replies
    • 2108 views
    • 49 replies
    • 4415 views
    • 49 replies
    • 5477 views
    • 49 replies
    • 2872 views
Sign in to follow this  
  • LATEST POSTS

    • In theory it does not, but in practice it is a facility that is not fully utilized, and takes resources from other areas.  In general it puts the organization at financial risk.  For a local unit, not so much impact until they see the update registration fee and may not realize that some portion of that is in fact a Summit Tax. Similar to a unit that goes all out for popcorn sales working to exceed last year, not necessarily a bad thing in general, but units, like organizations, only have so much bandwidth and human capital.  They all work on the sales and then other parts of the program suffer.  There must be a balance. When National has to move things, make events, and work to make Summit relevant, it's an issue.  Over time it will impact the outdoor program as there are only so many resource to go around
    • These sound like good things for a pack to use.  Can you not do this now?
    • I like a good rant as much as anyone, but how does this impact prioritizing an outdoor program?  If anything, providing more facilities for advanced outdoor programming is a good thing.  The location is within a day car drive for a very large percentage of the US population.  That would be good for encouraging more outdoor use.
    • Bring back the pioneering and Native American skills and games that were in the old Cub Program.   Let them play games that they can get filthy dirty in. Our fall hike was based on the old Bear leaf ID elective and the kids had a blast stomping around to identify them with an arborist dad.   One Grampa in the group found paw prints near the water and the cubs were trying to ID them back at the luncheon with the old stalking/tracking MB books the troop in town keeps on hand. 
        parents need to let the youth fail - fail at making a fire, or a meal or having their tent set up so it doesn’t leak.   It’s not like they’re being sent into the woods solo to fail - there are friends and adults there so it doesn’t get dangerous. 
        STEM/STEAM is good but they get that at school. What about letting the kids make the connection from ‘old’ skills to the STEMy stuff themselves. 
    • Actually they are voting today I believe, announcement tomorrow   if the They includes scout execs I know ours will vote for more $$. He has to protect his well over $200k every year (yes it’s that high.  Saw & read the annual report). He actually makes more than a few superintendents of schools in the council area. 
        no matter how large and well funded a unit is. The increase in fees will have a negative impact on the program that can be delivered at the local level. Something that seems to have been lost on the bombardiers of this latest adventure. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×