Jump to content

Advancement Resources

Scouting ranks, merit bades, and the advancement programs

2317 topics in this forum

    • 21 replies
    • 1632 views
    • 13 replies
    • 2640 views
    • 20 replies
    • 425 views
    • 34 replies
    • 1782 views
    • 67 replies
    • 1507 views
    • 56 replies
    • 1096 views
  1. When do you test?

    • 21 replies
    • 308 views
  2. When does a Rank start?

    • 16 replies
    • 246 views
    • 10 replies
    • 228 views
    • 14 replies
    • 1091 views
    • 80 replies
    • 1686 views
    • 24 replies
    • 975 views
    • 5 replies
    • 198 views
    • 12 replies
    • 1885 views
    • 12 replies
    • 196 views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • @Parkman, I agree with your perspectives, but in the last couple days I've been doing a lot of pondering.... I don't think Congress has put much stock in the BSA's charter for a long time.  It's probably viewed as just another antiquated decision from yesteryear.  I rather doubt Congress would intervene at all regarding the BSA's future.  It's true, the camps, HA bases, history, and goodwill would be gone.  But I'm starting to view the situation as we would a forest fire.  The fire burns everything in its path, healthy and detritus alike.  But what grows back is green and fresh.  Others have mentioned this, but it bears repeating--after legal action is complete, the movement that survives will resemble, to a great degree, what scouting looked like in the early days.  Unit autonomy.  Thriftiness.  Hiking and camping.  Less emphasis on red tape and more on adventure.  Chartering organizations can tailor the program to meet their expectations.  Reduce the uniform to work clothes and a neckerchief. Instead of summer camp and Philmont, hike to a local property or explore our vast state and federal park systems. Get outdoors again.  Hike in, pack on back, and study birds, chop wood with an axe and cook on a fire. In summary, the BSA is getting ready to pay a bill that was due many years ago.  Whether it's fair or not is immaterial at this point.  In addition to settling abuse claims, we are also paying for decades of poor strategic decision making, the total absence of any national-level, external public relations efforts, and abysmal financial management.  We'll do our duty as scouts and scouters.  And for those that remain after all is said and done will have an opportunity to start anew.   
    • This is a big part of the problem.  No-one publicly wants to describe the situation in these terms - to do so puts one in the position of being against the victims of abuse.  No one wants that label.  
    • Fair enough.  If it is shown that Chartered Organizations knew of the abuse and covered it up, my guess is that they will be included in the lawsuits.  I not only think that this is a possibility, it is a likelihood.   Yes, I do think Chartered Organizations should be actively involved in their units.  They should carefully select the leaders and properly supervise them.  The Chartered Organization owns the unit.  
    • What about no DEs to work with units? No offense to our DE friends - but just a hypthetical.  What would it look like if just about all unit support was done by volunteers?  Pros were there just for the really unusual or serious issues like YPT.
    • You're the one who keeps calling on Charter Organizations to have complete control. If that's the case, then they need to foot the bill for Victim Compensation. Somewhere, a long time ago, those adults were approved to be leaders by a Charter 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×