Jump to content

    • Really?  I've known quite a few.  It seems to me that, if scouting had little risk of long-term negative consequences, there would be no YP training.  It wouldn't be necessary.  YP training is necessary because there is a risk. I think, perhaps, it is more fun and glamorous for us old folks to complain of our old football injuries.  It is a statistical fact that there are more old people of my generation who claim to have old sports injuries than there were athletes when we were young.    Funny how that happens.    
    • I'd beg to differ here. Scouts does very much mandate participation. All troops do require a minimal level of participation to demonstrate that they are "active." "Active participation" is loosely defined by the BSA intentionally so that units can determine what level of participation is required. Troops vary greatly in this. Some are very strict and demanding of meeting attendance and camping participation, whereas others are more lax, but scouts who fall short of their troop's participation standards do not get the opportunity to advance, just like an athlete who does not attend practice regularly will not have the opportunity to play.
    • I'd be interested in hearing specific ideas that packs & troops have done that have resulted an in increased draw for Scouting.  Where have you faced losses to sports and other activities, done something to address that, and been successful? Thanks in advance
    • This is a very anti-sports article and many of the criticisms can also be applied to scout parents as easily as they could to sports parents
    • Let us know if you need bail money,  or a cobbler with a file inside. They do make a "ghost patch" it's all in white and very hard to see from over 10 feet away.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online