Issues & Politics
In answer to many requests, we established a separate forum for these topics. Those not interested can skip this forum instead of spending time reading unwanted messages to identify content.
2942 topics in this forum
-
- 5 replies
- 743 views
-
- 2 replies
- 743 views
-
- 5 replies
- 742 views
-
- 3 replies
- 741 views
-
- 0 replies
- 740 views
-
- 1 reply
- 740 views
-
- 8 replies
- 739 views
-
- 0 replies
- 739 views
-
- 7 replies
- 738 views
-
- 10 replies
- 738 views
-
- 1 reply
- 738 views
-
- 1 reply
- 736 views
-
- 5 replies
- 736 views
-
- 2 replies
- 736 views
-
- 1 reply
- 736 views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
By HashTagScouts · Posted
Currently at about 42,000, so looking for 19-20% growth in a year is a pretty big goal. -
By Eagle94-A1 · Posted
This concerns me about Scouts Canada, from the article above. "The audacious goal for 2025 Scouts Canada's goal is to support 50,000 young people with unique opportunities they wouldn't find elsewhere through new programs that meet the local needs of underrecognized, newcomer, and mainstream communities." 50,000 youth members? -
https://www.scouts.ca/news-and-events/news/2024/04/scouts-canada-makes-pledge-to-be-scouts-for-all-canadians New leadership and focus announced monday. -
By Double Eagle · Posted
How about a good look at the "Journey to Excellence" worksheet and head towards at least a Bronze rating? All those KPI can be ok, but wouldn't an advancement rep best report from their seat? SM is not a committee and should stick to SM stuff while committee can dig deep into expenses, advancement, recruiting. Pretty much the team while the SM is quarterback. -
I would lead with: 1) Is the PLC running the Troop well? 2) Are new scouts <2 years integrating well into the activities and patrols. 3) Are AOL scouts attending any meetings and outings and has that gone well? I think the other items are fine, but some should also come from committee members themselves (advancement chair, etc.).
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)