Jump to content

Issues & Politics

In answer to many requests, we established a separate forum for these topics. Those not interested can skip this forum instead of spending time reading unwanted messages to identify content.

2514 topics in this forum

    • 54 replies
    • 9529 views
    • 0 replies
    • 579 views
    • 0 replies
    • 739 views
  1. .... - American

    • 33 replies
    • 205 views
    • 108 replies
    • 602 views
    • 1 reply
    • 75 views
  2. 'tis the season....

    • 6 replies
    • 1089 views
    • 0 replies
    • 122 views
    • 41 replies
    • 451 views
    • 2 replies
    • 337 views
  3. "Bob White" and others

    • 23 replies
    • 380 views
    • 183 replies
    • 9825 views
  4. "Can you hear me now?"

    • 7 replies
    • 116 views
    • 0 replies
    • 131 views
  5. "Duck It's Dick"

    • 54 replies
    • 284 views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • I was not involved in OA as a Scout, and I am just now becoming familiar with OA as a Scoutmaster. Our troop recently conducted our first OA election with four candidates elected. I am also qualified with the required camping nights, but the lodge representatives said I did not need to be included on the ballot. Just to become more knowledgeable about OA, I feel like I (or some other adult leader in our troop) should go through the ordeal and become involved if I am sending off some of my Scouts. For lack of information, I am a bit apprehensive. Blind are leading the blind right now when it comes to OA.  
    • The COR is what they choose to be. They can be a paper official,  or take an active role, be there to help make decisions.  "Offishully"  , the COR and IH decide and approve who is and who is not the Unit Leaders.  It is their signature on the appointments and applications, yes? When  Chicago Council set about disassembling their camps, it was the volunteers that got the Council Voting Members (the CORs) together and embarrassed the Chicago Council leaders AND National, who thought they had a slam dunk in selling off all the camps.  Owasippee is still there, thanks to the CORs who got together and voted their votes, finally, and made the stink and reminded the County Boards who should be in charge.   Lots of discussion on Scouter.com about it.    AND   https://www.michigan-sportsman.com/forum/threads/owasippe-scout-property-in-jeopardy.90741/
    • I'll start by saying I don't personally own any sort of 'AR' and I don't think that anyone really needs one.  I see them as a macho kindof thing.... like owning a pit bull dog when their are much better breeds available. BUT I disagree with your statement.  I think it IS EXACTLY what they meant. Think about the context of what these people had just done.  With privately owned weaponry...muskets mostly that at the time were state of the art.... they overthrew an oppressive power.  I think they wanted folks to not get themselves into the very same situation that England itself did many years later in the late 1930's....faced a blitzkrieg and very few households guns....and definitely NOT state of the art ones.... on hand to defend their homeland with. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_American_Committee_for_the_Defense_of_British_Homes I tell you what, I think those guys (Founding Fathers, generally) could see into the future and the more I've learned and read about them over the years I'm often amazed by their foresight.  I am very cautious now to ever second guess them....
    •   No, I meant Boy Scouts..... Regular old Boy Scout Troop stuff..... so much classroom type stuff happens and so little adventure. I meant that what I know about venturing.... youth led groups doing fun stuff.....is what a regular troop SHOULD (IMHO) be doing....
    • But they are only updating cloud (and it's different than suite), the CC files are a different format than suite, and the save down option from cloud to suite has been hit and miss in my shop.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×