Jump to content

Open Discussion - Program

Share Scouting Topics here.

Subforums

  1. Scouts with Disabilities

    Where parents and scouters go to discuss unique aspects to working with kids with special challenges.

    673
    posts
  2. Going to the next Jamboree?

    A place to chat about Scouting's biggest gathering

    2674
    posts

8797 topics in this forum

    • 10 replies
    • 515 views
    • 1 reply
    • 460 views
    • 32 replies
    • 9300 views
    • 48 replies
    • 2523 views
    • 0 replies
    • 336 views
  1. ZERO HOUR

    • 14 replies
    • 339 views
  2. Zebras and Ducks

    • 13 replies
    • 347 views
    • 9 replies
    • 250 views
  3. YPT question

    • 9 replies
    • 225 views
    • 12 replies
    • 386 views
  4. YP and G2SS Questions

    • 48 replies
    • 1309 views
  5. Youth Training

    • 20 replies
    • 776 views
  6. Youth Training

    • 3 replies
    • 320 views
    • 6 replies
    • 310 views
    • 20 replies
    • 1683 views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • IMHO, ideally the CO should do this as they select and approve adult leaders. But the reality for me has been the CO does not do this. Since the Program (common goal) is easier to deliver with adults who are on the same page (who then attract similar adults), the unit leader and committee have to seek and recruit those adults and possibly turn away those who volunteered first.  I can recall a Pack trip to a AA baseball game. We managed to get scouts and adult leaders to attend in uniform, the fact it was Scout night with a discount helped. Hurray, easier to find and keep together. Hot night, by the third inning, I noticed some leaders who were also drivers, having a beer. Heh its a ball game, gotta have a beer!  Despite existing BSA guidelines regarding alcohol, we adults could not get on the same page, so no more ball games. Now, our unit is struggling with adults who use their cellphones while driving to events with scouts.  IMO, guidelines are only as good as the adults. Recruit better adults. My $0.02,
    • With all due respect, why is this in Issues and Politics? THIS IS AWESOME NEWS!  
    • The Simplifying Outdoor Access for Recreation (SOAR) Act, in part, would allow agencies to issue a single permit for trips that cross agency boundaries—USDA Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—a process that is currently time-consuming and entangled in red tape. Every year, Americans spend more on outdoor recreation than they do on pharmaceuticals and fuel, combined, the Outdoor Industry Association (OIA) reports. The outdoor recreation economy generates $887 billion in annual consumer spending, 7.6 million jobs, $65.3 billion in federal tax revenue, and $59.2 billion in state and local tax revenue—and it’s still growing. Recreation is a huge part of this country, but for a lot of people, there are still barriers to participate. Often, they turn to backcountry guides as their sole way of recreating. So why is it so hard for guides and their groups to access public lands?  Senators—Martin Heinrich (D-NM) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) introduced the bill. Source: https://www.snewsnet.com/adventure-travel/senate-introduces-simplifying-outdoor-access-for-recreation-act
    • I am no expert but I would think it would be entirely appropriate especially if the content is taken directly from the BSA guidelines.  If you're thinking about making your own rules, then your COR and your committee would probably need to approve the ideas first. But if you're talking about a "quick summary" of BSA guidelines for uniforms and smoking rules and other adult behavior guidelines, I don't see how that could be inappropriate. 
    • Would it be inappropriate of me to developing a Leader guide that sets expectations and guidelines for our Unit Leaders?   No smoking or any facsimile thereof around Scouts, uniform expectations for leaders, etc...  Everyone knows straight up what is expected of them?
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×