Jump to content

Open Discussion - Program

Share Scouting Topics here.

Subforums

  1. Scouts with Disabilities

    Where parents and scouters go to discuss unique aspects to working with kids with special challenges.

    673
    posts
  2. Going to the next Jamboree?

    A place to chat about Scouting's biggest gathering

    2674
    posts

8797 topics in this forum

    • 10 replies
    • 515 views
    • 1 reply
    • 460 views
    • 32 replies
    • 9300 views
    • 48 replies
    • 2523 views
    • 0 replies
    • 334 views
  1. ZERO HOUR

    • 14 replies
    • 337 views
  2. Zebras and Ducks

    • 13 replies
    • 345 views
    • 9 replies
    • 248 views
  3. YPT question

    • 9 replies
    • 223 views
    • 12 replies
    • 385 views
  4. YP and G2SS Questions

    • 48 replies
    • 1303 views
  5. Youth Training

    • 20 replies
    • 773 views
  6. Youth Training

    • 3 replies
    • 318 views
    • 6 replies
    • 308 views
    • 20 replies
    • 1679 views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • I am no expert but I would think it would be entirely appropriate especially if the content is taken directly from the BSA guidelines.  If you're thinking about making your own rules, then your COR and your committee would probably need to approve the ideas first. But if you're talking about a "quick summary" of BSA guidelines for uniforms and smoking rules and other adult behavior guidelines, I don't see how that could be inappropriate. 
    • Would it be inappropriate of me to developing a Leader guide that sets expectations and guidelines for our Unit Leaders?   No smoking or any facsimile thereof around Scouts, uniform expectations for leaders, etc...  Everyone knows straight up what is expected of them?
    • The thing that's missing here is a description of the program. We have aims and methods but no description of how the methods lead to the aims. It almost sounds like it's multiple choice.  It seems to me that @Eagledad is saying the program has a large component in which older scouts teach, work with, and lead the younger scouts to eventually take the place of the older scouts. Although I like this it isn't explicitly explained anywhere. @fred8033 seems to be saying it's less about that and more about adventure. Of course, that isn't described anywhere either. Maybe I'm putting words in people's mouths but my only point is there's no guidance as to what the program is. This is causing confusion. For a contrast, and I've mentioned this before, I met some Israeli scouts and their program is almost entirely about the older scouts guiding the younger scouts. A scout troop goes from Kindergarten to 21-ish. There are no den leaders and very few adults (2-3 in a troop of 100). The older scouts are responsible for everyone and everything. We talked about ranks and they just didn't see how ranks could help them with their responsibilities. Eagle was just an odd idea to them. If you're going to be an older scout then you will be running a troop. From the day you join as a 6 year old you know what you'll be responsible for as you get older. Whether you like this model or not, there's no question what the program is. Everyone knows what it is. I'd rather see more outdoors but their sense of camaraderie, teamwork, and community is impressive. The scouts I met, while admittedly a select group, were above and beyond what I've seen in any similar group in the BSA. Leadership, confidence, responsibility. They were an impressive group. They also have over 90% of eligible youth in their scouting program.  
    • You need a common goal...or enemy.
    • When I staffed JLT, NYLT's predecessor course, the #1 complaint from the Scouts at the 6 month post-course conference, was that the SMs would not let the Scouts use what they learned to run the troop. Back in the day, the SMs had a precourse meeting they attended with their Scouts going, and they could attend the graduation ceremony and banquet. Most of the problem SMs didn't attend either. Strongly recommend it, especially for new SMs.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×