Jump to content

Open Discussion - Program

Share Scouting Topics here.

Subforums

  1. Scouts with Disabilities

    Where parents and scouters go to discuss unique aspects to working with kids with special challenges.

    622
    posts
  2. Going to the next Jamboree?

    A place to chat about Scouting's biggest gathering

    2603
    posts

8421 topics in this forum

    • 8 replies
    • 134 views
    • 54 replies
    • 834 views
    • 17 replies
    • 253 views
  1. Generations

    • 7 replies
    • 221 views
    • 12 replies
    • 155 views
    • 18 replies
    • 303 views
    • 8 replies
    • 279 views
    • 8 replies
    • 207 views
    • 16 replies
    • 389 views
    • 5 replies
    • 144 views
    • 15 replies
    • 294 views
    • 22 replies
    • 451 views
    • 86 replies
    • 1944 views
    • 42 replies
    • 749 views
    • 6 replies
    • 172 views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • Tough one.  They are not allowed to do more than preliminary planning until all signatures - including the District/Council representative - are in place.  The page specifically says that the District/Council approval is last and thus it would not have been provided without the others being present. I say it is a tough one because, based on the information you provided, I would not accept the project.  It is a really tough lesson for a Scout to learn but it was his own mistake.  His SM or Eagle Adviser should have warned him not to do the work but he also should have read and understood the workbook and known he could not start yet. As for how to handle....  Undoubtedly it will come up (either here or within the unit) that he can just get the preapproval signatures now, allow the work that has already been done and continue with the post-project signatures.  In my mind, that is not a valid option - the rules are very clear that work cannot begin until the project is approved.  That would be like accepting work done before a Scout earned First Class to satisfy a requirement that says "while a First Class Scout, do..." Good Luck.  I look forward to reading other opinions and how it turns out.  
    • David might have been referring to current maritime law which I was not sure if I remembered correctly. If so, thank you David for the clarification.
    • I am not sure what law you refer, but the Continental Congress absolutely issued Letters of Marque to attack British ships. In fact, they did so before they even wrote the Declaration of Independence. Which is why British Captains considered any ship under Continental Flag as a pirate and subject to the worst forms of treatment, including hanging, conscription or what amounted to a death sentence on British prison ships. The British did not treat POW's well in many cases, but sailors were often treated worse because of them being considered pirates due to their Letters of Marque.
    • Some of this is already in Leatherwork  
    • I have an Eagle Candidate who started working on his service project last summer.  He had verbal approval from the beneficiary, email approval from his crew advisor & SM on the idea, even presented the project to our parent committee.  The project is now complete but in reviewing the workbook documents, there are no signatures on Page E of the project plan. Any advise on how to handle this?
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×