Jump to content

Forum Support & Announcements

Sign in to follow this  

Forum support and announcements from SCOUTER.com

158 topics in this forum

  1. Posting pictures

    • 1 reply
    • 1597 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1614 views
  2. ping

    • 7 replies
    • 1917 views
  3. Hey, look!

    • 21 replies
    • 3810 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1944 views
  4. SPAM

    • 0 replies
    • 2995 views
  5. Thread Hidden

    • 2 replies
    • 1756 views
  6. New Topic?

    • 12 replies
    • 4122 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1614 views
    • 5 replies
    • 1906 views
    • 10 replies
    • 2018 views
    • 9 replies
    • 1822 views
    • 17 replies
    • 2389 views
  7. Forum Feature Requests

    • 2 replies
    • 1976 views
    • 178 replies
    • 16223 views
Sign in to follow this  
  • LATEST POSTS

    • I am not aware of one. At least not officially. 
    • There have been a couple references in this thread to A-IOLS. Is there an advanced version of that training currently?
    • I dont think those who have issues with wB believe the scouters who have taken the course are not dedicated, or do not have the desire to be better scouters. I percieve the issue to stem from the idea that wB training is the pinnacle of all scouter training. For me, this is where the disconnect arises. wB is good training, but it in no way meets the standard that it aspires to be. This is not necessarily the wB program, but the inexperienced folks taking the course. Most just don't have the pre-requisite experience and training to fully benefit from a top level training. Hence my suggestion for training levels. If the concept of levels was too much like "rank" then ditch it. The main point is that too many scouters are basically starting and ending with wB. There needs to be significant training and experience for a scouter leading up to what is claimed to be the pinnacle of training. If not, we are putting the whipped cream and cherry on top of nothing.
    • I'm in favor of more and better training for Scouters.  I've written about that before.  I'd really like to see for each major position (SM, ASM, MC, CM, DL) a more significant program of training to get you ready.  Not just position training -> IOLS -> Wood Badge.  I would think that the programs need to be tailored to the role. i.e., as a CC it's only tangentially relevant to my role to send me through wilderness plant identification training.  The Wood Badge topic I always find funny.  About 90% of the Wood Badge comments I read are from non-Wood Badge Scouters complaining about the course and those that have taken it.  I'm well aware that most of us have met a Scouter somewhere that was a jerk and decided to get beaded.  I'm saddened by those people.  In my travels, that vast majority of Wood Badge Scouters I know are dedicated Scouters who took Wood Badge in the hopes of being a better Scouter.  
    • Sadly this happens already with some folks. I've encountered folks whose attitude is "If you don't wear beads, you don't know squat."  And I agree is does indeed cause drama and problems we don't need. I've seen some extremely experienced and knowledgeable Scouters get frustrated with the attitude and either quit Scouting all together, or just refocus their energy on the unit.  Me personally, I get a kick out of using all the WB/NYLT techniques, methods, and language, and getting asked what critter I am. I love the look on folks' faces when I proudly jump into song, "I'm a Cocky Curlew of the Brownsea Camp...."   Going over the Patrol Method in online training is not enough. I've seen too many ignore it, misunderstand it, or think it's antiquated and BSA needs to change with he times. Even in the old Scoutmaster Fundamentals Training  where you were assigned to a patrol the first full day of class, were part of the same patrol during the second Model Meeting class, expected to have a patrol meeting, then operated as a patrol during the final 3 day weekend class was not enough for some. The Adults in the unit really need to model it, and mentor it. Also the Patrol Method needs to be STRICTLY ENFORCED (emphasis), something that has not been happening in the troop I am in of late.  And it's not being enforced under the guise of being "family friendly" as the SM told me. EDITED: That's the irony. He wants to be family friendly, but does not see how doing so is slowly destroying the patrol method and thus the troop.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×