[Fwd: Philmont Weight Limits]
Calvin H. Gray (405geezer@IGG-TX.NET)
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 11:37:51 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------33826209639
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sounds like Philmont is going thru one of the "stupid" kicks they get on
from time to time. Call Philmont at 505-376-2281 and ask to speak with
the Chief Medical Officer. Explain the situation. They may want to
contact your doctor before hand or when you get to Philmont and go thru
the medical re-check. If you still have problems, speak with Bill
Spice, BSA High Adventure Director who resides at Philmont or Frank
Reigelman, Philmont Director of Program.
--------------33826209639
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: <<@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU:owner-scouts-l@TCUBVM.IS.TCU.EDU>>
Received: from pucc.PRINCETON.EDU (pucc.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.99])
by georgetown.igg-tx.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA20641
for <405geezer@IGG-TX.NET>; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 11:10:14 -0500
Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.PRINCETON.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with BSMTP id 3843; Thu, 26 Jun 97 12:04:21 EDT
Received: from TCUBVM.IS.TCU.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@TCUBVM) by PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8562; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 12:04:21 -0400
Received: from TCUBVM.IS.TCU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@TCUBVM) by
TCUBVM.IS.TCU.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9610; Thu,
26 Jun 1997 11:07:29 -0500
Received: from TCUBVM.IS.TCU.EDU by TCUBVM.IS.TCU.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.8b)
with NJE id 9580 for SCOUTS-L@TCUBVM.IS.TCU.EDU; Thu, 26 Jun 1997
11:05:04 -0500
Received: from TCUBVM (NJE origin SMTP@TCUBVM) by TCUBVM.IS.TCU.EDU (LMail
V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9579; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 11:05:03 -0500
Received: from listserv.okstate.edu by tcubvm.is.tcu.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with TCP; Thu, 26 Jun 97 11:04:52 CDT
Received: from okway.okstate.edu by listserv.okstate.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT
v1.1a) with SMTP id <0.A043E620@listserv.okstate.edu>; Thu, 26 Jun
1997 11:03:49 -0500
Received: from ccMail by okway.okstate.edu (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1
Enterprise) id 0013B34F; Thu, 26 Jun 97 11:04:19 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Message-ID: <0013B34F.1991@okway.okstate.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 11:00:53 -0500
Reply-To: jbush@OKWAY.OKSTATE.EDU
Sender: Scouts-L Youth Group List <Scouts-L@tcu.edu>
From: "John E. Bush" <jbush@OKWAY.OKSTATE.EDU>
Subject: Philmont Weight Limits
To: Multiple recipients of list SCOUTS-L <SCOUTS-L@TCUBVM.IS.TCU.EDU>
On Saturday, June 21, there was some discussion on SCOUTS-L about the
Philmont weight limits and how strictly they are being applied. Can
anyone tell me if this is new this year? I know this is the year that
the minimum participant age moved up from 13 to 14, so I suspect that
they tightened this up also.
I am advisor for trek 722A. I also received one of the memos regarding
the weight limits and stressing that participants cannot be over the
maximum acceptable weight FOR THEIR HEIGHT. I had not interpreted the
medical form that way. I took it that the absolute prohibition was that
no one weighing over 295 pounds could go on the trail. I was under
that, so I heaved a sigh of relief. Evidently I am not the only one who
misunderstood, or they wouldn't be sending out the memo.
Now I have to either grow 4 inches taller or lose 25-30 pounds by July
22. What's worse is that I am the only over 21 adult on our trek and I
took the trouble to get recertified in CPR and First Aid to meet that
requirement.
Folks, I have been on three backpacking trips in mountainous terrain
(the Ouachita mountains in SE Oklahoma and SW Arkansas) in the last few
years. It was a bit lower elevation, but plenty of steep ups and downs.
No physical problems--a little tired at the end of the day, but no
exhausted, and better off than a lot of the boys.
Last summer I went on an extremely strenuous canoe trip out of the BSA's
Charles Sommers Canoe Base. Our crew went on a route that was
significantly longer than average for the length of trip. Our
interpreter (guide) even admitted that it was more tiring than normal
for him. Again, I had no significant physical problem.
My own doctor did OK me for the trip. I have had a recent treadmill
test showing no heart problems.
I know several local Scouters who are at least as overweight as I am who
have taken multiple Philmont treks without problems.
The point? Isn't this new policy (if it is new) a bit of overkill? I
recognize what they are trying to accomplish, but it looks to me like
they are throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Anybody out there want to go on a Philmont trek next month with a neat
group of Scouts? I'm disappointed and angry that after working for 4-5
years to get a trek for our troop, I'm not going to be able to go on the
trail. But I'll be d*mned if I am going to let that keep my crew from
going.
YiS,
John Bush, Troop Committee Member, Troop 828, Stillwater, Oklahoma
plus other Scouting hats too numerous to mention.
jbush@okway.okstate.edu
--------------33826209639--
Terry Howerton Sakima Group, Inc. SCOUTER Magazine Kansas City | 
