| |
Re: Can/Should the Advance Chair "refuse"?
Michael Cooper (mcooper@MCOOPER.SEANET.COM)
Fri, 31 Jan 1997 09:45:53 -0800
Mark Arend wrote:
>
> At 07:45 PM 1/30/97 -0800, you wrote:
> >About 6 months ago we changed ScoutMasters...
> >While I myself (though some parents do) have no complaint that no Scout
> >seems able to pass a SMC the first time,
>
> How does someone fail a Scoutmaster Conference? After I've met with a boy
> there would have to be something pretty drastic for me not to sign off--and
> I think I'd have some suspicions of trouble ahead of time.
> Mark W. Arend
I guess I didn't know that the SM Conference was a pass or fail
meeting. It was my undserstanding it was a "held" or not meeting. Many
things are discussed during this meeting and even goals are set to be
monitored and reviewed at a later date, but "pass" or "fail"? Signing
that a Scout has had a SMC doesn't automatically recommend the Scout for
anything, it just shows that the SM and the Scout have met and are aware
of the status of the boy. JMO.
Michael Cooper
Unit Commissioner
Puget Sound District
Mt Baker Council
Terry Howerton Sakima Group, Inc. SCOUTER Magazine Kansas City |
|
|
 |
|
|
