Fw: Re: OA Elections- a clairification
Fred Rogers (fredrogers@VNET.IBM.COM)
Mon, 21 Mar 1994 11:26:46 EDT
Oops! I meant for this to go to the list rather than to Jeff.
Fred Rogers fredrogers@vnet.ibm.com
----------------------------- Note follows -----------------------------
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 94 11:21:27 EDT
From: Fred Rogers <fredrogers@vnet.ibm.com>
To: wastelander@psu.edu
Subject: Fw: Re: OA Elections- a clairification
On Mon, 21 Mar 1994 11:23:50 -0600, Jeff Menaker <wastelander@PSU.EDU> writes:
>
> In addition to Jeff's clarification, adult nominees DO have to meet the same
> camping requirements as the youth nominees. It seems, in the back of my mind
> that there either is, or has been proposed, a way to adjust the long-term
> camping requirement somehow--but it does still have to be met.
If the nomination is by the district or council, the camping
requirement CAN be waived. Nominations by the unit must still meet the
camping requirement. The fact that the requirement can be waived in
the case of district and council nominations does not mean that it must
be waived.
Fred Rogers fredrogers@vnet.ibm.com
Gajuka Lodge #477
Terry Howerton Sakima Group, Inc. SCOUTER Magazine Kansas City | 
