Re: Front page V's Page Mill
Jason T Selkowitz (selkowtz@u.washington.edu)
Tue Mar 24 12:03:04 1998
Mark McCormack wrote:
>
> Several of you out there have set of web sites and i am thinking of
> doing my own. So what can people tell me about the Adobe Pagemill
> verses the Microsoft Frontpage?
Mark,
I highly recommend Adobe Pagemill. If you decide to get it for Win95,
make sure you get version 3.0 (just released; some store shelves may
still have 2.0). Not to say FrontPage is bad, but I've seen its
results, and I much prefer Pagemill.
Here's why I recommend Pagemill over FrontPage:
* Less expensive;
* Produces much cleaner HTML code;
* Doesn't bias one browser over the other;
* Includes excellent site management and publishing features;
* Includes a basic version of Photoshop;
* Good technical support (ever try to get any from Microsoft? :-).
No, I don't work for Adobe; I just use some of their products, and they
are very excellent. For more information, see the Pagemill info page:
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/pagemill/prodinfo.html
My home page is built entirely with Adobe Pagemill, and although it's
fairly simple, you can get a look-see at: (how's this for shameless
self-promotion? :-)
http://weber.u.washington.edu/~selkowtz/
My site is just one example of many built with Pagemill. Good luck with
your decision.
Yours in Scouting,
Jason T. Selkowitz
**********************Jason T Selkowitz************************
* Seattle, WA 98195-0042 * mailto:selkowtz@u.washington.edu *
* (206) 934-1574 * http://selkowitz.home.ml.org/ *
***************************************************************
* Boy Scouts of America, Chief Seattle Council #609 *
* District Committee Member, North Lakes *
* Washington State Jewish Committee on Scouting *
* Eagle Scout (1994); NESA member *
***************************************************************
| 
