Re: Net and photos, names, etc.
Paul S. Thompson (paulie@HOME.MSEN.COM)
Mon, 28 Dec 1998 21:26:05 -0500
I think we can all agree that most assaults are perpetrated by people with
whom the victims are familiar. This is true in all types of assaults with
all types of victims. The major thrust of our protective efforts,
therefore, must address the dangerous people in our immediate environments.
However, that is not to say we should ignore the very real threat posed by
predators on the Web. They exist and are, in a very real sense, a threat to
our children.
So, in my opinion, both sides of the debate are valid (although the word
"paranoia" connotes a delusional fear and is certainly too harsh for this
discussion).
Since experienced Scouters hold such diverse opinions on this subject, it
seems probable that the parents of our Scouts will, as well. I would
suggest that the parents be consulted. If parents do not, under any
circumstance, want pictures of or textual references to their children on
the Web, that choice should be honored. If parents want only limited
exposure (no close-up pictures, no last names, etc.) on the Web, that
should be honored. If parents have no objection to pictures and names being
used, that opinion should be honored.
Because of the personal nature of youth protection, this would have to be
done on a Scout-by-Scout basis. Granted, that would make the logistics of
photography difficult but text should be simple to handle. Something this
personal deserves the extra effort.
We should not accuse anyone of being too lenient or too strict in the
protection of their own children. We should recognize their right, however
much we disagree with their position, to protect their children as they see
fit, as long as they abide by the laws of their community.
Paul Thompson, CC
Pack 287
Romeo, Michigan
