Re: "Nit-Pick about Child Abuse Training"

David Ball wrote:

>If we are going to be pedantic, it surely should be child anti-abuse
>training. It is not training on how to abuse anti-children (whatever an
>anti-child may be...)

But, you see, we still have an imprecision with language where precision
matters, because you have the child as the abuser needing anti-abuse
training. Perhaps a more precise term would be: "Training for Adults in
the Non-Abuse of Children." ;^)

Bob Morehead
ASM, Troop 381
Cople, Ohio

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message
• Previous message