Re: "Angry Parent" update

On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Paul S Thompson wrote:

> His take on the situation was, and I'd appreciate some feedback from you
> folks on this, that making up the Big Ideas was "outside of the program"
> and should not be allowed because of, among other things, the legal
> liability the committee would subject itself to if something happened
> during the make-up. The BSA would support us fully if we operate within
> the rules but would let us twist slowly if we didn't.

I fail to quite see how the Pack could be legally responsible for
something the Tiger did with his parents, whether it was meant to make up
something Pack-related or not. It strikes me as being in the same league
as holding the school system legally responsible for my fall at the
public library where I took my son so he could complete a homework
assignment. Only in America, as the late, great Harry Golden would have
said.

Cheryl

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message
• Previous message
• In reply to